<i>"News normally follows accumulation or distribution, just because we don't know, doesn't mean that others don't. If there are definite signs of A or D present then you have to assume that there is a group of people that are looking for a directional move to start or continue, going against them is like tackling 5 football players by yourself, size of balls is irrelevant "</i>
That is true. On a day like yesterday where selling pressure was prevalent all session, a great many times it will resolve by defensive buying efforts being crushed into the close as indexes hit new lows.
Many examples of that exact scenario are visible in charts from peak index highs last year until now. How many afternoon sessions tried to bounce one or several times, only to be crushed into drastically lower lows by the closing bell? How many traders tried to buy those false breaks of resistance, trendlines, bullish oscillators, etc past 3pm est only to be smashed in the resulting sell-stop cascade?
Yesterday's outcome was an outlier. For every massive v-reversal into the close, many more sessions will continue to trend or roll sideways.
Also, big money players with inside news to work with do not "suck in" anyone. They press the market up or down in grinding directional fashion while everyone else wonders who the hell is bucking a trend. Once the news has broken hours later, it is apparent what big money knew ahead of time.
When markets v-reverse like they did yesterday, it ain't from a cluster of retail traders flipping their five-lots around. Big money players were short at 3:30pm est, and they changed their minds when unknown (to them) news was released.
If the news had been know to them, price action would have never failed dramatically on the late afternoon 2:57pm est pop which was sold into with gusto. Big money would have been that pop, pushing to new session highs before news ever reached CNBC
That is true. On a day like yesterday where selling pressure was prevalent all session, a great many times it will resolve by defensive buying efforts being crushed into the close as indexes hit new lows.
Many examples of that exact scenario are visible in charts from peak index highs last year until now. How many afternoon sessions tried to bounce one or several times, only to be crushed into drastically lower lows by the closing bell? How many traders tried to buy those false breaks of resistance, trendlines, bullish oscillators, etc past 3pm est only to be smashed in the resulting sell-stop cascade?
Yesterday's outcome was an outlier. For every massive v-reversal into the close, many more sessions will continue to trend or roll sideways.
Also, big money players with inside news to work with do not "suck in" anyone. They press the market up or down in grinding directional fashion while everyone else wonders who the hell is bucking a trend. Once the news has broken hours later, it is apparent what big money knew ahead of time.
When markets v-reverse like they did yesterday, it ain't from a cluster of retail traders flipping their five-lots around. Big money players were short at 3:30pm est, and they changed their minds when unknown (to them) news was released.
If the news had been know to them, price action would have never failed dramatically on the late afternoon 2:57pm est pop which was sold into with gusto. Big money would have been that pop, pushing to new session highs before news ever reached CNBC
