Which is equivalent to whether you should buy a boring stock for 5x p/e (peak valuation 6-7x) or a tech name for 100x p/e. It is a philosophical question for money gamers like me
I think the bigger question is - would you pay USD 2 million for a mediocre - at best - house in Santa Monica, or USD 2 million for a much better house in another place.
The thing is, there are a lot of good locations that aren't ridiculously overpriced.
I think I'd prefer something in the middle. A decent location with good access to infrastructure and a decent house.