5% of their entire GDP on a single project?
Let me know when the get FUNDING, not a "necessary legal framework".
This seems like a ridiculously high investment, that would also have a much higher ongoing maintenance cost than surface rail.
Given that they claim it will reduce heavy trucks on the roads by 40%, it sounds like they're going to have to directly compete on price with existing shipping.
You would think someone writing an article about something like this would at least try to compare the costs of shipping freight via this concept vs. the existing systems.