"This is the worst case of insider trading ever."

Seriously, even before I read this thread, I just naturally assumed this type of activity occurred.

It's very possible that the transactions may not be able to be traced to the originators. I know it's hard to imagine by people that lived their whole life in this country, but having lived and worked in third world countries, I can tell you that unreported financial transactions are just the way things are done in certain places. Not only by criminal organizations, but even just legitamate businesses and ordinary people in certain places. And I've only lived in the most developed third world countries. Who knows what goes on in less developed places or places with an overly corrupt government. If this were not case the war on drugs would be a cake-walk for the US.
 
Quote from C Robinson:



lol lol lol. if anything the media is complicit in dropping the ball on this story. as far as credible sources go you will never be satisfied. i remember hearing about this story in the first 48 hrs... what do you consider a credible source?
More...


echo,

direct figures with time/sales from any quote vendor. not an inept interpretation of same. where are they ??

best,

surf
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

i maintain that this is a media hoax, and the volume occured AFTER the event, or it is a self fullfilling prophecy of sorts by funds "piling" on due to possible slight spike per previous poster. i



i will keep an open mind and accept credible info to the contrary....


best,

surfer:)
More...

Right! right! Like the moon landing it's all hoax...but I digress..

286x, 60x avg volume is a normal spike and not to be thoroughly investigated and reported. Yeah right...

What would you or anyone else consider an abnormal activity in option volume that requires redflaging and full investigation?

100% 200% 300%???? for crying out loud this is what? over 25,000% on UAL? 6000% on AMR?

Right!...Profiteering from prior knowledge of significant events a.k.a. fraudulent insider trading never happened before either..

Long time option traders in these forums do check your archived data and report. Raw data from the source will shed a lot of light into this.
 
Quote from TM_Direct:



Im the same way though.....how about 60 minutes? CNBC? MSNBC? ABC? NY TIMES? ...and I still haven't seen this 'bloomberg report" just people citing it...can somebody put it up if it exists?
More...


it's all rumour mill. people 'want' to believe. why ?? who knows.

best,

surfer
 
Quote from Nolan-Vinny-Sam:



Right! right! Like the moon landing it's all hoax...but I digress..

286x, 60x avg volume is a normal spike and not to be thoroughly investigated and reported. Yeah right...

What would you or anyone else consider an abnormal activity in option volume that requires redflaging and full investigation?

100% 200% 300%???? for crying out loud this is what? over 25,000% on UAL? 6000% on AMR?

Right!...Profiteering from prior knowledge of significant events a.k.a. fraudulent insider trading never happened before either..

Long time option traders in these forums do check your archived data and report. Raw data from the source will shed a lot of light into this.
More...


still awaiting the data, come on true believers, prove me WRONG.

LOL !

:D
 
Quote from marketsurfer:




still awaiting the data, come on true believers, prove me WRONG.

LOL !

:D
More...

Im with you surf BUT....did you see my post about the OCC?? It only goes back to october 2001.....which makes me wonder why???????but I keep hearing 'according to Bloomberg"...but have never seen the actual bloomberg story.....hmmmm?????
 
lol. maybe 'they' want the offending traders to think it all blew over so that they try to claim their profits, and thats when *BAM* we nail em.

or maybe bt alex brown, buzz krongard, nora slatkin and the rest of them really did engineer the most evil theft imaginable, and it has been simply erased from history except for a few rogue 'alternative' websites. you do have to wonder, what were two former DCIs doing on the boards of investment banks in the first place.

i don't think it's safe to assume anything regarding what is or isn't in the media, after all, our president, secretary of defense and secretary of state all warned that deliberate misinformation would become the status quo.

i'm pretty sure i remember this story was all over the headlines, new york times, etc right after 911. you have to admit it's a little odd that there's scarcely a trace of it anywhere now when you search cnn, nyt, bloomberg, etc. whether it's true or not, that in itself is suspect.

i know it's pretty weak, but this site seems to credit main stream sources:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/HEN204B.html

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top