This is the time to talk about climate change
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
Germany is just virtue signaling. They have a lot of make up for because you know...they were literally Nazis. Probably why the left loves Germany so much.
Still haven't told us what you are personally doing to combat climate change. Nothing, am I right?
So you're leading the discussion toward the nazis, once again. What a poor attempt at deflection.
But if you must talk about it, should we also talk about the raping and pillaging in Vietnam by American soldiers? What about Japanese internment camps? I thought America was about equal opportunity, where did that disappear suddenly?
What about the picture of Russian soldiers dragging 12 year old girls to be gangraped?
But I get it, they're heroes since they won.
This is why there's a grid across the EU being built. There's always wind or sun somewhere.
What is your obsession with this all or nothing approach? There can be some coal left as a backup, so it can be ramped up when other sources can't provide. Percentage of renewables has been CONSTANTLY increasing and will continue.
That "Dailycaller" article is full of garbage as many claims don't have any sources, it's just opinion.
This subforum isn't my personal blog. No need for whataboutism.
That's because you gave me the bullshit about 'stone age' if coal isn't used, Germany didn't use coal and they are not in the stone age, can you even follow an argument?
Germany doesn't have internet? Are they back in the stone age?
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/global-warming-for-experts-only.312895/page-9#post-4513490
I came to the growing realization that I had fallen into the trap of groupthink in supporting the IPCC consensus. I began making an independent assessment of topics in climate science that had the most relevance to policy. I concluded that the high confidence of the IPCC’s conclusions was not justified, and that there were substantial uncertainties in our understanding of how the climate system works.
I realized that the premature consensus on human-caused climate change was harming scientific progress because of the questions that don’t get asked and the investigations that aren’t made. We therefore lack the kinds of information to more broadly understand climate variability and societal vulnerabilities.
As a result of my analyses that challenge the IPCC consensus, I have been publicly called a serial climate disinformer, anti-science, and a denier by a prominent climate scientist. I’ve been publicly called a denier by a U.S. Senator. My motives have been questioned by a U.S. Congressman in a letter sent to the President of Georgia Tech.
While there is much noise in the media and blogosphere and professional advocacy groups, I am mostly concerned about the behavior of other scientists. A scientist’s job is to continually challenge their own biases and ask “How could I be wrong?” Scientists who demonize their opponents are behaving in a way that is antithetical to the scientific process. These are the tactics of enforcing a premature theory for political purposes.
So the science division of the Republican Party has determined that guns can not only stop bad people, but they can also stop bad weather??