This is no clown car... Republican debate

AAAintheBeltway said:
It's not that I disagree with you guys about Fiorina's performance. She came close to dominating the debate, which is no mean feat considering each of the others candidates did pretty well themselves. The problem with her is similar to the problem with Jeb! Two strikes against each of them. With her it's Lucent and HP, with him his father and brother, both terrible presidents. Nice guys but disastrous presidents. it's not unfair to say that most of the chaos in the middle east is a direct result of their policies. If we had stayed the heck out and let the arabs sort it out on their own, we would have been a lot better off.

Carly's over the top neo-con rhetoric scares me and is not a winning message for the general election. People have had enough body bags and heroes coming home missing arms and legs, and for what? WTF exactly has it all accomplished? The fact is no company will give her another shot in the C suite, which tells me plenty.

I would have to say Trump kind of brought up the rear. He didn't handle several issues too well. He made a mistake with his comment about Fiorina's looks, even though in all honesty, she probably has depleted the botox supply for California. I thought he should have been a little tougher with Jeb! on the point about Jeb's mexican wife. For example, he could have said " I'm not attacking your wife but your amnesty support is so idiotic that I am trying to find a rationale for it."

Trumps' performance in the first debate was also underwhelming and it seemed to make zero difference.
More...
"Carly's over the top neo-con rhetoric scares me and is not a winning message for the general election. People have had enough body bags and heroes coming home missing arms and legs, and for what?"

A legitimate concern that I have as well. I'm attributing it to not having a cock syndrome. She's over compensating, at least I hope so. If not she's a wee bit too crazy on the we'll kick their butts posturing, as is Trump. Paul is the most measured on this issue and I like his position, but he's toast. Has no chance.
 
WeToddDid2 said:
This is great news. Since when did you start to use Fox News to fact check? Never thought that I would live to see the day. Perhaps you should use it more often.
More...
Did you want to take issue with any of Fox's fact checks?
 
They mocked Trump for saying he would meet with Putin and sort things out, but it is the best approach and I think he could probably do it. Putin wants respect first and foremost and Trump knows how to deal with tough opponents. Threatening him with military power is ridiculous. Are we really going to war with Russia because they send troops into Syria to deal with ISIS? It's a worse bluff than obama's red line there. Putin is doing us a favor if he wipes out ISIS.
 
I liked Carson's zoot suit. His shirt collar was messed up though. The stay on one side was too long. Very distracting. Maybe set him up with Larry Kudlow's tailor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jem
Ricter said:
The Fox News fact checking I just posted confirms that Trump's interest in casino gambling in FL is a matter of public record.

No one can verify that she did delete classified information containing emails, if they are truly deleted.
More...
The above info from Fox was not in the original article you posted. They still used hearsay as their evidence.

Completely agree on the emails. So, therefore, no one can state either way as fact.
 
WeToddDid2 said:
Okay; I will take on several of them.


"• Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee said that Hillary Clinton was "under investigation by the FBI" because she "destroyed government records." Not true. She had the authority to delete personal emails."

Factcheck/USA Today has no way to verify that Clinton did not delete emails that would have been considered government records. Only way to state this as fact is if they have analyzed every single deleted email otherwise they are simply making shit up.

Do you want me to address more of them?
More...

You declare that USA Today has no way of verifying that Clinton did not delete emails that
would have been considered government records. Then neither does Huckabee have a way of verifying the status of such emails, and that government records were destroyed. Your argument supports Factcheck's busting of Fuckabee.
 
globuli said:
You declare that USA Today has no way of verifying that Clinton did not delete emails that
would have been considered government records. Then neither does Huckabee have a way of verifying the status of such emails, and that government records were destroyed. Your argument supports Factcheck's busting of Fuckabee.
More...
That is some twisted ass logic. You must be a libtard.

Please see my post right above yours.

Completely agree on the emails. So, therefore, no one can state either way as fact.
More...
 
I am done arguing over this bullshit. Factcheck.org is not a fact check site. It is a political propaganda site that attempts to further the liberal agenda. Factcheck.org uses speculation, opinion and hearsay as facts. Those are not facts. In other words, they have redefined "facts" as anything libtards believe is a fact regardless if true or not.
 
WeToddDid2 said:
I am done arguing over this bullshit. Factcheck.org is not a fact check site. It is a political propaganda site that attempts to further the liberal agenda. Factcheck.org uses speculation, opinion and hearsay as facts. Those are not facts. In other words, they have redefined "facts" as anything libtards believe is a fact regardless if true or not.
More...
Looks like you have your beliefs well insulated, then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top