This Forum overtrades options

[On.Target]

Quote from atticus:

Wow, why don't you PM me with his email address? Smoke signals are unreliable.

I sent you his email.

 

[bwolinsky]

Patience. Patience.

I had to redo the backtests.

The profit factor is 200 swing trading QM on a 2401 bar.

The file is too large. Stand by, please.

 

[atticus]

Quote from bwolinsky:

Patience. Patience.

I had to redo the backtests.

The profit factor is 200 swing trading QM on a 2401 bar.

The file is too large. Stand by, please.

 

[bwolinsky]

Quote from bwolinsky:

Patience. Patience.

I had to redo the backtests.

The profit factor is 200 swing trading QM on a 2401 bar.

The file is too large. Stand by, please.

 

[atticus]

Quote from On.Target:

I sent you his email.

 

[On.Target]

Quote from atticus:

So none of you worthless f*cks can piece together a backtest? You're joking, right? On the contrary, Bill, you're placing the responsibility on me to corroborate your bullshit.

I am not going to negotiate with myself. You've got a better shot of providing proof of the Higgs Boson.

Thick is an understatement.
I now know what Mr. Schamp means by traders poking their own eyes out.
I've never seem such a bunch of panty waists scared of something that was free. Hell I'm testing it cause I want it to work. If it doesn't what I am I out . . . friggin nothing but then I can actually be credible when I say it sucks.

 

[Martinghoul]

Quote from atticus:
...You've got a better shot of providing proof of the Higgs Boson.

Ha! You seem to have forgotten that Bwol is a genius... Armed with his minor in Mathematics, a perfect understanding of Nash's Equilibrium and topology, he can produce you the Higgs boson in a matter of picoseconds.

In fact, I propose a welcome innovation on this thread. I think a competition to determine a best Bwolinsky fact is in order. I'll start:
- "Bwolinsky doesn't have to prove the existence of the Higgs boson. The Higgs boson has to beg Bwolinsky to acknowledge its existence"

 

[bwolinsky]

Sorry, that last one was too small and fuzzy.

Here, check this out.

I will find the Boson as soon as Heisenberg tells me why he can't remember where the electron was a minusmillisecond from now.

 

[atticus]

Quote from Martinghoul:

Ha! You seem to have forgotten that Bwol is a genius... Armed with his minor in Mathematics, a perfect understanding of Nash's Equilibrium and topology, he can produce you the Higgs boson in a matter of picoseconds.

In fact, I propose a welcome innovation on this thread. I think a competition to determine a best Bwolinsky fact is in order. I'll start:
- "Bwolinsky doesn't have to prove the existence of the Higgs boson. The Higgs boson has to beg Bwolinsky to acknowledge its existence"

Fear of spiders is arachnophobia, fear of tight spaces is claustrophobia, and fear of Beau Wolinsky is logic.

 

[bwolinsky]

Quote from atticus:

Fear of spiders is arachnophobia, fear of tight spaces is claustrophobia, and fear of Beau Wolinsky is logic.

Just look at my post, atticus. I decided I'd like to shut you down if you claim I can't do better than 20:1. I haven't looked at this backtest until I remembered how excited I was when I first saw it, after completing one of my first genetic optimizations.

Now, also, what I've done here is use only the code of the ergodic with no autostops, so I may have posted BS before but if you reference any of my posts I can clear it up for you.

How was that? 200 Profit Factor on QM? I use PFG to trade futures for my CTA.