This Forum overtrades options

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from atticus:

Wilcock knows less about QM than my 4yo. He's a bigger nut than you if he believes he's the reincarnation of Cayce. Begs the question, why is that a claim to fame?

I'm not saying he knows anything about trading, but what he's explaining has scientific basis which is a much harder argument to make than simply making those arguments. He was implying the periodic waves of torsion fields create these cycles and similarities in history effecting our evolution.

You've still got to wonder why they look almost identical, and he said that it was due to this cyclicality, and I think it's unquestionable that he's probably right given the more than 3 hours it took to completely watch the videos, which I don't think you have watched anything but maybe the first 30 minutes, which doesn't bring you to his conclusions that are a summary of scientific research that supports his theses..
 
Quote from bwolinsky:

I'm not saying he knows anything about trading, but what he's explaining has scientific basis which is a much harder argument to make than simply making those arguments. He was implying the periodic waves of torsion fields create these cycles and similarities in history effecting our evolution.

You've still got to wonder why they look almost identical, and he said that it was due to this cyclicality, and I think it's unquestionable that he's probably right.

Not crude, quantum mechanics. I saw the video and they hardly look identical. He's an unwashed loon doing the Omaha Sheraton conference circuit.

Unquestionably probably right?

I have nothing against Cayce, but much of what he proposed was utter horseshit. Re: age of the pyramids is a prime example.
 
Quote from atticus:

Not crude, quantum mechanics. I saw the video and they hardly look identical. He's an unwashed loon doing the Omaha Sheraton conference circuit.

Well, I don't think it was about quantum mechanics. He was taking empirical experiments, basic ones, that had been done by NASA and Chinese Astronauts so by the end he shows the effect of space euphoria and how that made these enormously large plants by virtue of the fact that they were taken into space and initiated out of that euphoria growing way beyond typical size for such plants that hadn't been taken into space on rockets.
 
Wow, this thread just gets weirder and weirder. It has long ceased to have anything to do with options, over traded or otherwise.
 
Quote from TraDaToR:

Ah you are just saying that. I am reassured.

I mean if you think it happened yesterday or one day you wake up floating in concious reality just to start spouting off stories about it and still believe what I'm saying is a hallucination to keep my ssd, you're wrong. It happened, and I was aware of it. That's all.

It doesn't effect my trading strategies either.
 
Quote from bwolinsky:

Hi, I'd like to point out that so many times when I'm reading this forum it's always about some schmuck who would like to do something fancy option wise so they'll put on a butterfly or say something with the favorite catch phrase of an iron condor but more often, it is usually an individual trader making too many bets than he has to to make the money he wants.

A strangle is stupid. Come up with ways to predict which way the market will move, then trade options that way. Quit these idiotic options combinations and make directional bets. That is what makes money, not this idiotic I'm guaranteed to make money if I buy both a call or a put or I should make some small profit off theta or vola is too low so I think there's a high probability of a 4% move but I don't know which way it'll go so I'll be a dumass and put a strangle on just so I'll be sure that I can report a profit on at least one of them but god help me if they're at the money on expiration.

Seriously, this is one of the sophisticated parts of trading, but the more stupid strategies I see people putting on just for the sake of supposedly managing risk doesn't make any sense. If you're betting both ways there's no point to even being in the position and unless you have some reason to put a share to somebody there's no reason to ever sell a put and without question don't ever sell a naked call.

You should either use options to hedge by buying small percentages of your portfolio in put options whenever whatever marginal winning system you have is when you should do it and just see it as paying 3% to protect yourself which is a much better investment some would say than taking it to somebody who would not buy such insurance.

Haven't done greeks but the only thing I care about to calculate my hedge ratios is delta, and I use that delta as a target dollar amount that I convert into the requisite percentage to figure out how many contracts to buy,. If you're not doing that maybe your broker doesn't allow you to trade options.

Here's all they're for, managers figure they'll make between 7-15% every year, and in the off chance that they have a bad year their standby is the zero return year because their positions went against them but they had a bunch of options contracts but practically all of the financial institutions won't do this, (probably except for Karen Feinerman on fast money she seems to enjoy buy russell puts more than 5% OTM).

So why do we have so many threads discussing possible options combinations to buy when all you need to do is bet the correct direction. Don't bet both, you won't make any money that way, and I'm sure there'll be some flak from saying that but even after studying options in the CFA curriculum there's not much place for the strategies designed to exploit theta decay because it can be convexly disadvantageous, especially if you're working in bonds or bond futures just watching the prices of bonds move for the first time I thought that they'd have a bit more push up but now that the yield curve is about to go inverted we'll be in for some more money printing so even from the perspective of inflation you'd only want to trade those anyway.

Why complicate these things? Trade directionally. Build systems designed to hedge or leveraged long/short by buying puts that'll protect 80% of your portfolio at least. They don't cost much and if you're timing's good but it doesn't have to be because it assumes a consistent periodicity and ti****ble for investment I think that a lot of the volatility many will experience in options will go away if they really try to target what they're trying to make and actually examine which way a stock or ETF might move.

The options on index futures strategy is safer in the sense that it's the whole market, but don't trade them unless you really have some conviction about where you think the market might move to.

Buying leaps is fine, but don't expect the moves to be even close to 1 for 1. If you're in the money after a year and a half, then that leap should probably be sold at the earliest possible time and wait for a pullback. That's the long, but I don't know hardly anybody trading put leaps.

You might also want to recommend people not trade the way you do while you're ranting.
 
Quote from Archin:

You might also want to recommend people not trade the way you do while you're ranting.

Archin, when I have a point to make I will make it, and I type extremely fast. Don't confuse ranting with personal attacking, because there are very good points I made there, that don't qualify as a rant because it isn't overly emotional, and just because someone is saying more than 5 paragraphs doesn't mean they aren't making valid points or that it should be dismissed because due to length that makes it a rant. That's wrong, and you're wrong if you think that's a rant.

It's well documented now what my opinions on most options strategies are, so send less money to the broker and make directional or hedging decisions as insurance, but don't use a strangle, or an iron condor, or any other that requires you to bet for moves that would take away from the profit of the other. That's what I'm saying, and quoting that just makes me have to re-explain the entire thread so these issues were explained so please read all of this before issuing an allegation that I was ranting there or trade while I'm ranting. No, I trade when I have orders to place, and I'm very cautious about not taking discretionary trades ever. Ever. Especially in options.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top