Quote from TraDaToR:
Beau "Danger" Wolinsky. Your sport accomplishments are even more impressive than your CFA curriculum and Robbins signatures. The guy is losing his breath after 5 minutes gay bladin' on a flat road.Give me a break.
What on Earth is "proprietary capital management arbitrage"? Did you just find 4 random vaguely financial terms and string them together in random order? "Risk management trading systems" sounds a little better, but not by a lot.Quote from bwolinsky:
My thoughts. That's my neighborhood and hearing what I was thinking in July makes me all the more focused on making the investments I've made in proprietary capital management arbitrage and risk management trading systems progress that much further.
Quote from Martinghoul:
What on Earth is "proprietary capital management arbitrage"? Did you just find 4 random vaguely financial terms and string them together in random order? "Risk management trading systems" sounds a little better, but not by a lot.
I think you're wrong as well... I think our friend bwol is so far ahead of us in this finance space that we just can't comprehend the beautiful complexities of his various endeavors. "Proprietary capital management arbitrage" is the new cutting edge activity that will catapult bwol to the pinnacle of the business world. He will be a captain of industry and a mover and shaker in no time at all and we will all be left behind in his wake.Quote from DontMissTheBus:
Dude, you are parsing it wrong:
It's (proprietary capital) (management arbitrage) =>
(spending his own money) (giving himself a cool sounding title in his own one person shop)
Quote from bwolinsky:
A few changes to note:
Currently, rather now than risking $500,000 for a measly 5 fold profit of $2.5 million, you can risk less than $40,000 by daytrading only and make substantially more money.
This is called an iterative refinement, but not in the sense that you're compiling your program for every single case where you might want to enter or program your robot genetically to know when its optimal to.
And the pairs model went from -17% to -8% because I made this video so I would know what I was thinking, and hearing this back really has helped.
Quote from TheGoonior:
This suddenly came to mind after I watched the first few "breathy" moments of the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmQhKsHcOOQ&feature=related