Quote from ByLoSellHi:
Has anyone had a chance to listen to this yet? If so, what'd you think about the analysis of the different economists and bankers who commented?
I listened to this bylo. Very good link. This is how I understand that podcast. Yes the big banks are insolvent.
The TARP money is keeping the balance of asset and liability, and that appears solvent on paper.
No, they bank owners do not want to mark to market their assets because this is proof (on paper) of insolvency, and that will cause the big money depositors to do a bank run because they know they have no insurance of FDIC for most of their money.
But the banks can not loan that TARP money to make money on interest because if they do they can not cover their depositors money, (back to insolvency)
So their answer is to nationalize, fix them, sell again.
What happened to the bad bank idea for the toxic assets?
All those stocks only good if the banks work.