Third World Immigration Controls Save Denmark Billions of Pounds- attn US citizens

RCG Trader · May 1, 2011

Quote from Artful D0dger:

Bullshit. We need troops on our souther border. No treaty absolves us of a right to have OUR troops on OUR land. Try again.

What we need are troops on the border, and a mass deportation of every illegal we can find. Follow that with a policy which heavily discourages 3rd world immigration. Also, legal 3rd world immigrants could be offered incentives to leave.

Another guy who has been using that Delorean too much. But that thing back in the garage, this is not 1951

RCG Trader · May 1, 2011

Quote from Artful D0dger:

1) That's not a treaty.

2) CIVILIAN law enforcement. Preventing illegal immigration is not CIVILIAN law enforcement.

"Again, study". LOL!

I stated that I mis-spoke about the treaty. Relax. Or try to anyways

The feds will not take this up as an issue. They are leaving it up to the states. As such, the Army cannot be used. Get it? Got it? Good.

Artful D0dger · May 1, 2011

LOL! Yeah that whole "secure border" thing is SO 1951. The new, cool thing to do is to have no real border at all and get flooded with 3rd worlders which tear up your economy and society. ROFL! Very convincing.

Whatever you say Mr. Nurse

Quote from RCG Trader:

Another guy who has been using that Delorean too much. But that thing back in the garage, this is not 1951

Ricter · May 1, 2011

Quote from Artful D0dger:

But that's not what Denmark did, their immigration has favored not financial status, but ethnic origins. Turns out, that's worked out very well for them.

Trying to steer this to country of origin is a waste of time. Immigration decisions are made on individuals by individuals. To an immigration officer, "on average" is useless. I have been through an independent immigration myself, I had to prove sufficient money in hand, so I know of what I speak

RCG Trader · May 1, 2011

Quote from Artful D0dger:

LOL! Yeah that whole "secure border" thing is SO 1951. The new, cool thing to do is to have no real border at all and get flooded with 3rd worlders which destroy your economy and society. ROFL! Very convincing.

Whatever you say Mr. Nurse

Nothing wrong with my profession, I make great money, and I am surrounded by women.

Too bad you lacked the foresight, but we are looking for new recruits all the time, it might not be too late, if you can get out, that is

The way you want to secure the border is...., well keep talking, build that profile

Artful D0dger · May 1, 2011

I have been through an independent immigration too, congrats.

Pointless? Well, seems to be working pretty well for Denmark. Even the non-rich western immigrants to Denmark seem to be doing well than all the non western immigrants. Hmmm. You're going to have to come up with something better with which to patch that hole in your poverty/class theory.

Quote from Ricter:

Trying to steer this to country of origin is a waste of time. Immigration decisions are made on individuals by individuals. To an immigration officer, "on average" is useless. I have been through an independent immigration myself, I had to prove sufficient money in hand, so I know of what I speak

Artful D0dger · May 1, 2011

So you were wrong on 1) it being a treaty and 2) that it prohibited military being used in NON CIVILIAN law enforcement.

Thanks for gracefully admitting you were wrong on all points.

Quote from RCG Trader:

I stated that I mis-spoke about the treaty. Relax. Or try to anyways

The feds will not take this up as an issue. They are leaving it up to the states. As such, the Army cannot be used. Get it? Got it? Good.

RCG Trader · May 1, 2011

Quote from Artful D0dger:

So you were wrong on 1) it being a treaty and 2) that it prohibited military being used in NON CIVILIAN law enforcement.

Thanks for gracefully admitting you were wrong on all points.

Uh Oh, a slow learner.

What part about there not being any non-civilian law enforcement do you not get? Go back, re-read, and re-submit. Thank You.

Ricter · May 1, 2011

Quote from Artful D0dger:

I have been through an independent immigration to, congrats.

Pointless? Well, seems to be working pretty well for Denmark.

Then you know that the immigration officer's decision is not, "you're from country x therefore you're approved."

Artful D0dger · May 1, 2011

I never said there was anything wrong with it. I guess 40-60k is your idea of "great money"? Nothing against you, but I can't say that would do it for me. Besides, I wouldn't benefit from the racial discrimination hiring policies like you. You have far more opportunities than I.

The way I want to secure the border? With the military and whatever technologically aided methods they want to employ. Also develop an efficient, humane deportation process and task force for the 30 million illegals we have here.

Build what profile? Are you saying you favor profiling practices?

Quote from RCG Trader:

Nothing wrong with my profession, I make great money, and I am surrounded by women.

Too bad you lacked the foresight, but we are looking for new recruits all the time, it might not be too late, if you can get out, that is

The way you want to secure the border is...., well keep talking, build that profile