That is exactly one of the strategies I use for +30 years now.
Maybe the play is not to be buying breakouts, but buying quality when it DROPS close to the EMA of your choice, with a very tight stop below said EMA
Why would that be better?Maybe the play is not to be buying breakouts, but buying quality when it DROPS close to the EMA of your choice, with a very tight stop below said EMA
Why would that be better?
Advantages ? Disadvantages?
That is one awewome post I must say. Thank you for sharingIt is very simple:
First you want to know what you want to own. Your universe.
Then you take a longer EMA and a shorter one.
When prices comes under the shorter EMA and your shorter EMA is above the longer EMA and price goes back over shorter EMA,you have your entry and know the level of your stop. Use positionsize accordingly and maken sure you have a trailing stop that let you have 5 r winners or more. Piece of cake. Getting your mind around it that it can be this simple is another story...
If you want the big returns you have to get comfortable with being uncomfortable.because in this kind of market environment , more breakouts turn into fake outs.
I’m also coming to the conclusion that I’m more comfortable with that style.
Even I. Investing, I was always more of a value and GARP investor than a MOMO investor.
If you want the big returns you have to get comfortable with being uncomfortable.
My theory is the reason people hire financial advisors is so they don't have to make uncomfortable decisions.