tell me if you disagree with this statement:
if as an emerging manager you are trying to raise capital just on your returns, you are sunk.
if as an emerging manager you are trying to raise capital just on your returns, you are sunk.
If that is similar to a First loss program in the USA, then yes. I'm not a fan. An example without any names, is you provide $1mm in a pooled asset in their name. They give you $10mm of BP for an approved strategy. They claim after 1 year of good performance they will help you start a fund. During the first year, you have what I say is a problem. A PMA with $1mm gets up to $6.67mm of BP. Their $10mm is like them providing your $500K of their assets and $1mm of yours as if you put up $1.5mm of your money, in your account, you would get up to $10mm of BP. They often take 45% of profits during that time. And, what do you tell investors. Your returns are based on $1mm or $10mm of AUM. They say it helps raise money based on the BP. I think the deal is horrible but some of these have $200mm of their assets and about the same of what I think I horrible deals with despite managers.