You mean like the ad in the LA Times you posted?
So you're okay with free speech that has content you approve of. Otherwise it is not free speech? Just curious: is the content in the ad false or factual? Not the opinion, but the content leading up to it. I believe the content is factual. So are you upset with the factual content or the fact that someone is exercising their free speech in addressing how the factual content be dealt with?The ad is trying to get facebook to silence people, shut them up. Like breitbart for example.
So you're okay with free speech that has content you approve of. Otherwise it is not free speech? Just curious: is the content in the ad false or factual? Not the opinion, but the content leading up to it. I believe the content is factual. So are you upset with the factual content or the fact that someone is exercising their free speech in addressing how the factual content be dealt with?
See, now you're full of shit. It has already been proven. I won't waste my time debating facts with you."They amplified white nationalists by including news sources with known extremist ties"
Umm, no.
See, now you're full of shit. It has already been proven. I won't waste my time debating facts with you.
https://news.google.com/search?q=white nationalists facebook&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en
what have we got here? Cons bitching about how someone uses their 1st amendment rights? Color me shocked for today