My statement isn’t confounding, money is not the issue - it’s supply disruptions and shifting service demand to goods. Add to that the war in Ukraine too.
I find it confounding, so you don't really get to tell me what is, and is not "confounding" to me from what you have stated.
You say it isn't money, yet then say it is shifting service demand to goods, as if it can be one without the other.
If you dump billions into the system fiscally (again, not monetary but fiscal policy) that money has to go somewhere. You can't argue that all money is being used to pay down debt, and in the same breath go "its a shifting of service to demand of goods".