OK optioncoach. Let's say you are 65 years old, retired, kids married and gone and spend days in your house in the lovely countryside. With your grandkids at your feet you take $500,000 of your $3M net worth and play on the computer with your setups and make an average 10% per year and write posts telling people what a great guy you are.
Then you see people come and go and act the fool and every once in a while you get someone that has actually figured something really good out. Something that could benefit lots by moving money exponentially, consistently and relatively safely up in 5-10 years.
Depending on the amount to use this could grow to $2-5M or $30-50M. BUT the person has no real credibility or net worth and so he/she bumble along for a few years since they do have the real deal.
They don't need to take a shellacking from people that think they know except for the selfish interests of these slandering, belittling posters that really aren't contributing much - especially in comparison to what may be envisioned by the OP.
Mostly these scenarios unfold because people know there is <i>something</i> inherent with great underlying value. It is just far from yet becoming a certain reality and hence the needless aggressive banter.
If there was a spirit of true communication that promoted constructive furthering of knowledge and improvement of each others goals and desire - that would be different.
But obviously jealousy and greed and a whole lot of other blinding factors ooze from most postings and no real honesty comes forth. So who is at fault? The person endlessly trying to defend or promote their worth (self or otherwise) or the drive-by posters that say mostly negative put-downs?
paysen$e
Then you see people come and go and act the fool and every once in a while you get someone that has actually figured something really good out. Something that could benefit lots by moving money exponentially, consistently and relatively safely up in 5-10 years.
Depending on the amount to use this could grow to $2-5M or $30-50M. BUT the person has no real credibility or net worth and so he/she bumble along for a few years since they do have the real deal.
They don't need to take a shellacking from people that think they know except for the selfish interests of these slandering, belittling posters that really aren't contributing much - especially in comparison to what may be envisioned by the OP.
Mostly these scenarios unfold because people know there is <i>something</i> inherent with great underlying value. It is just far from yet becoming a certain reality and hence the needless aggressive banter.
If there was a spirit of true communication that promoted constructive furthering of knowledge and improvement of each others goals and desire - that would be different.
But obviously jealousy and greed and a whole lot of other blinding factors ooze from most postings and no real honesty comes forth. So who is at fault? The person endlessly trying to defend or promote their worth (self or otherwise) or the drive-by posters that say mostly negative put-downs?
paysen$e
