There was no big bang?

WeToddDid2

WeToddDid2

But, but.........Stephen Hawking said..........

But, there was a scientific consensus and the science was settled.

http://news.yahoo.com/big-bang-deflated-universe-may-had-no-beginning-140017504.html

If a new theory turns out to be true, the universe may not have started with a bang.


In the new formulation, the universe was never a singularity, or an infinitely small and infinitely dense point of matter. In fact, the universe may have no beginning at all.

"Our theory suggests that the age of the universe could be infinite," said study co-author Saurya Das, a theoretical physicist at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada.

The new concept could also explain what dark matter — the mysterious, invisible substance that makes up most of the matter in the universe — is actually made of, Das added.
More...

"So when we say that the universe begins with a big bang, we really have no right to say that," Brandenberger told Live Science
More...
 
But the science is NOT settled. You are a nitwit.

from the article

However, the new equations are just one way to reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity
 
Do you think a libtard congressman or senator will send a letter to the employers of these scientist in an attempt to silence them or does that only happen with global warming?
 
futurecurrents said:
But the science is NOT settled. You are an idiot.

from the article

However, the new equations are just one way to reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity
More...
THANK YOU FOR STATING THAT.

Exactly, a scientific consensus does not equate to the science being settled in any way.

You are the idiot.

That is what you call bait you dumb ass. Thank you for being so stupid and taking the bait without giving any thought.
 
Last edited:
WeToddDid2 said:
THANK YOU FOR STATING THAT.

Exactly, a scientific consensus does not equate to the science being settled in any way.

You are the idiot.

That is what you call bait you dumb ass. Thank you for being so stupid and taking the bait without giving any thought.
More...

7dQZ5tL.png


Masterful Trolling!
 
I'll try to make it simple for you to understand. Your premise is that nature of the start of the universe is/was settled science. It is not, nor was it. Thus, once again, you show that you are an idiot.
 
WeToddDid2 said:
THANK YOU FOR STATING THAT.

Exactly, a scientific consensus does not equate to the science being settled in any way.

You are the idiot.

That is what you call bait you dumb ass. Thank you for being so stupid and taking the bait without giving any thought.
More...

His statement would evoke the collective "gasp" from the courtroom upon cross.

He has an amazing lack of self awareness.
 
Futurecurrents has asserted that Global Warming is "settled science" several dozen times on ET.

The village idiot just keeps growing more hugely stupid...

A4cWeQM.png


So FC answer one question - is Anthropogenic Global Warming "settled science"?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top