There goes the neighborhood

Quote from kjones5159:

It caught my attention not because I think the GS person is some sort of end-all be-all or something like that, but that previous to this I hadn't caught any articles where Wall Streeters were even talking about a top, or caution in the least. As an observation of the playing field sentiment beginning to shift. How immature and simple your immediate jump to a conclusion was in that someone from GS opened their mouth and my reaction to this was to immediately act like Pavlov's dog (which was yours) and take X position as recommended in said article, and the fact that you relentlessly dog me in a thread that I made as if it would somehow benefit you, leads me to think that you are projecting or trying to compensate. I think you need to get off my dick, there's a difference in having a voice, opinion, and spine, and being a troll on an internet forum who goes after any fart they catch a whiff of.

I don't even understand why you care about my trade, make your own if you don't like mine, better yet create an original thought instead of flaming someone else's.

And there is also a difference between talking shit and clearly illustrating reality to those who apparently do not see clearly. Though you probably have not an inkling of that line.

Let it go. You stated people here were talking shit on page one, when nobody gave you a moment's grief. This awesome call backed by GS looks to be a pile of shit. Buying the 1375P for Sep14 is baked. Perhaps you should have left GS out of it as you prefer to disavow it now.
 
Quote from atticus:

I see 30 ES points. It's comical that you were talking shit and then had the balls to call this a good call. Thanks for the elaboration, Mr Freud. Can you talk about your dick one more time?

No worries, I am done here. I was just curious as you your explanation on how to spin this loss into a "good call". Ah right, low volume on the 30 points.

You are still yet to accept anything that I say, like a child. I did not buy that option, and I did not make a day trade. You must be unfamiliar with grammatical structure or something.
 
Quote from kjones5159:

You are still yet to accept anything that I say, like a child. I did not buy that option, and I did not make a day trade. You must be unfamiliar with grammatical structure or something.

That must be it. It couldn't be your backpedaling. It's not a day-trade so a marked loss is just paper. The argument predicated on an article concerning a reco by a GS analyst that you apparently didn't read. People talking shit on page one. Something about your dick.

So the call was awesome and you made a mint. Good job.

Bye.
 
Quote from kjones5159:

[
4. Not sure where you came up with this data, corporate taxes are at very high levels and our per capita GDP has shrank since pre-mortgage bond bubble [/B]

effective corporate taxe rates are in fact at generation lows and corporate cash levels are at generation highs. if you cant get that right why bother with further analysis?
 
your on the money on both those facts with big corporations. its because the fed is printing money and very little taxing. its not because its a booming economy. you need to look at smaller businesses were people spend money to get a better measure.

Quote from Free Thinker:

effective corporate taxe rates are in fact at generation lows and corporate cash levels are at generation highs. if you cant get that right why bother with further analysis?
 
Quote from kjones5159:

You are still yet to accept anything that I say, like a child. I did not buy that option, and I did not make a day trade. You must be unfamiliar with grammatical structure or something.

So I'm guessing someone should blow you for being correct because you deserve that ?
 
Quote from atticus:

This awesome call backed by GS looks to be a pile of shit.

Lol

Muppets bought it, as usual.

A great indicator. I think I might try coding it up...
 
Back
Top