Theologians Think They’re Smarter Than Stephen Hawking

Quote from jem:

you are so dense you do not realize that when Ricter blames the bullet for the damage he is joking. He gracefully conceded I have a valid position.

OK, we know. We agree, temps preceded CO2 levels in the past most of the time. Now you must concede that CO2 is greenhouse gas and the high levels we have now is caused by man and are/will lead the higher temperatures. Simple as that. If you can't agree to that then what I wrote above about you remains valid.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

...CO2 is greenhouse gas and the high levels we have now is caused by man and are/will lead the higher temperatures...
How do you KNOW it will be different this time if CO2 has lagged higher temps in the past?

Your environmental science degree?
 
Quote from Lucrum:

How do you KNOW it will be different this time if CO2 has lagged higher temps in the past?

Your environmental science degree?

Because it's different this time. Never before has large quantities of fossil fuel been burned and this much CO2 put in the air this fast. And, how many times do we have to tell you, CO2 is a greenhouse gas.

So guess what? What I said above about you remains valid.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Because it's different this time. Never before has large quantities of fossil fuel been burned and this much CO2 put in the air this fast. And, how many times do we have to tell you, CO2 is a greenhouse gas.

So guess what? What I said above about you remains valid.

So let me get this straight, it's so hot on venus because of all the cars and smog in it's past or is that a result of our burning fossil fuels here on earth?
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Well it is.

Besides, it's been proven that CO2 has lead temps higher in the past.

That's what I thought. You really don't know, you're just repeating the simplistic, brain-dead left wing line on it.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

That's what I thought. You really don't know, you're just repeating the simplistic, brain-dead left wing line on it.

Yeah OK, are you trying to be as stupid as jem?
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Yeah OK, are you trying to be as stupid as jem?

FC, lucrum has identified the inconsistencies in the leftist GW argument, and I can refute it with pre-historic evidence from trees pre-iceage.

It's happened before, and is a mix of solar activity, including sources besides our own sun.

Really, watch the videos I posted and learn what a torsion field generator does. It's near the beginning.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Yeah OK, are you trying to be as stupid as jem?
Well...considering I was quoting YOU. Wouldn't that mean I was trying to be as stupid as you?

Quote from futurecurrents:
05-05-12 08:22 PM
That's what I thought. You really don't know, you're just repeating the simplistic, brain-dead right wing line on it.
 
Back
Top