Quote from gblnking:
My ex-father-in-law was a man who followed people of the likes of Art Bell. He would buy the conspiracy magazines from the grocery check out lines and read them like they were the bible. We literally argued for hours about his belief that the moon landing was a government hoax just to fool the American public into believing that we were ahead of the Russians in science. He was a very charismatic man and would come up with these elaborate arguments and present a slew of âscientists and scientific evidenceâ to back him up. He very much believes that the world is controlled by a secret society and again heâll back it up with plenty of theories and people to back up his arguments. Should these âtheoriesâ be debated in our public high schools? How about if along with math, English, history, and science we add the Devinci code as a core curriculum class.
These types of theories make for great literature and should be debated. But debate them in college where young minds have a bit more maturity (or at least we hope hey have) and can weed through the absolutely ridiculous to the more plausible alternative scientific ideaâs. Leave high school for building foundations.
agreed but who gets to the build the foundation is critical.
Things that were part of my education growing up in public schools in new york and Ct have been replaced by what I consider to be pure social engineering bullshit.