The war on blacks: New Study shows dems pay black people 30% less than white campaigners.

[Max E.]

LOL, black people getting fucked by democrats yet again...... when will they ever learn.

African American staffers on Democratic federal-level campaigns are paid 70 cents on the dollar compared to their white counterparts; Hispanics are paid 68 cents on the dollar.

Women on campaigns are also paid less than men, although at a rate not too far from parity: 95 cents on the dollar. Interestingly, although the proportions of staff are more skewed towards white men on Republican campaigns, the income disparities are more pronounced on Democratic campaigns.

http://neworganizing.com/content/blog/who-are-the-campaigners-in-america

 

[Lucrum]

 

[dbphoenix]

On the other hand . . .

The racial/ethnic diversity of staff on Democratic campaigns appears impressive. African Americans account for 12% of the American workforce (source) but account for more than twice that share of the workforce on Democratic federal-level campaigns. Staffers of Hispanic and Asian backgrounds are not represented on campaigns at the same level as the overall workforce, but Democratic campaigns are considerably more balanced by this measure than Republican campaigns. Women are underrepresented on campaigns. Republican campaigns have more pronounced disparities both in gender and racial/ethnic representation among campaign staff. 54.2% of all staff on Republican federal-level campaigns are white men, compared to 32.4% on Democratic races. Even on the more gender-balanced Democratic campaigns, however, there are 116 men for every 100 women staffers.

Always a good idea to go to the source material rather than take somebody's word for what it contains.

 

[fhl]

On the other hand . . .

The racial/ethnic diversity of staff on Democratic campaigns appears impressive. African Americans account for 12% of the American workforce (source) but account for more than twice that share of the workforce on Democratic federal-level campaigns. Staffers of Hispanic and Asian backgrounds are not represented on campaigns at the same level as the overall workforce, but Democratic campaigns are considerably more balanced by this measure than Republican campaigns. Women are underrepresented on campaigns. Republican campaigns have more pronounced disparities both in gender and racial/ethnic representation among campaign staff. 54.2% of all staff on Republican federal-level campaigns are white men, compared to 32.4% on Democratic races. Even on the more gender-balanced Democratic campaigns, however, there are 116 men for every 100 women staffers.

Always a good idea to go to the source material rather than take somebody's word for what it contains.

yeah, if you're gonna pay em less, it makes sense to hire more blacks.

democrat economics

 

[dbphoenix]

yeah, if you're gonna pay em less, it makes sense to hire more blacks.

democrat economics

Also helps to look at things like experience. As I said, look at the data rather than offer a knee-jerk response.

 

[Max E.]

So you are saying that paying them an hispanics 30% less is justified since they hire more of them? I guess when you get their services on the cheap you can afford to do that. I have no doubt that Democrats also had more black slaves working for them during the time of slavery.

On the other hand . . .

The racial/ethnic diversity of staff on Democratic campaigns appears impressive. African Americans account for 12% of the American workforce (source) but account for more than twice that share of the workforce on Democratic federal-level campaigns. Staffers of Hispanic and Asian backgrounds are not represented on campaigns at the same level as the overall workforce, but Democratic campaigns are considerably more balanced by this measure than Republican campaigns. Women are underrepresented on campaigns. Republican campaigns have more pronounced disparities both in gender and racial/ethnic representation among campaign staff. 54.2% of all staff on Republican federal-level campaigns are white men, compared to 32.4% on Democratic races. Even on the more gender-balanced Democratic campaigns, however, there are 116 men for every 100 women staffers.

Always a good idea to go to the source material rather than take somebody's word for what it contains.

 

[Scataphagos]

"So you are saying that paying them an hispanics 30% less is justified since they hire more of them? I guess when you get their services on the cheap you can afford to do that."

Maybe you have to hire 2 to get the same amount of work done as 1 other.. ??

 

[Lucrum]

On the other hand . . .

Anything to avoid having to acknowledge reality and the colossal hypocrisy of the Democraps.

 

[fhl]

 

[dbphoenix]

So you are saying that paying them an hispanics 30% less is justified since they hire more of them?

No, I'm saying that no one is entitled to equal pay unless he or she has equal experience, equal skill, equal talent, equal whatever else is required for the job. If all of these people are equally qualified AND not receiving equal pay, then you have something to rant about.