.
July 24, 2008
SouthAmerica: The bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac also can be seen as a bailout to keep foreign investors interested in investing in the United States at least for a little longer.
It is not only the US dollar that has been melting in the last 6 years â for example the US dollar lost half of its value against the euro during that period â but lately other foreign investments also are disappearing as its value melts down to nothing â such as Fannie and Freddie.
Last Friday I noticed the column on the FT about âToo Chinese to Failâ â according to the article the poor mainland Chinese investors are stuck with over $376bn of the agency long-term debt as of June 2007 and that represents less than 1/3 of the amount invested by foreign investors on this latest fiasco.
That means that the poor bastards (foreigners) are stuck with more than US$ 1.3 trillion dollars of Fannie and Freddie long-term debt as of June 2007.
Talking about being taken for a ride.
Now the US government had to intervene to keep these institutions from going bankrupt and going out of business and wiping out these foreign investors.
These days the Chinese government must be reevaluating alternative investments around the world since they have realized that they have been investing in a real money pit.
The Chinese must be stunned by the massive losses that their investments in US dollar has generated over the years â it is like investing in the Titanic then watch the big ship sink slowly.
******
âToo Chinese to failâ
Published: July 18, 2008
Financial Times - UK
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may not have many friends these days, but they should be able to count on a certain loyalty in Beijing. China is the biggest foreign holder of debt issued by the troubled enterprises and a relatively captive buyer of the paper.
US Treasury data shows that mainland Chinese investors owned $376bn of agency long-term debt at the end of June last year, almost one-third of total foreign holdings of the agencies.
Virtually all of this is probably held by an agency under the central bank which oversees the bulk of reserves. Extrapolating on the basis of China's growth in foreign assets, economist Brad Setser reckons the country now holds $500bn-$600bn worth of agency paper, or a 10th of the outstanding stock of agency debt.
Rather than sticking with straight debt, SAFE has been shovelling up the agencies' asset-backed securities â at the end of June last year, China held $206bn. That may well be harder to dump. Even in more normal times, commercial banks â the other natural buyers â often have balance sheet constraints. Pricing is also more sensitive to changes in market rates.
In future, switching into different instruments could also prove a struggle for China given the volumes involved. Replacing annual purchases of $150bn or so of agencies with alternatives is tough. Buying more Treasuries would impact yields, while moving into corporate bonds would ratchet up risk.
That is something which China, still smarting from big paper losses in Blackstone and Morgan Stanley, is presumably keen to avoid. These US investments were both, in a roundabout way, funded by foreign exchange reserves. None of this makes government-sponsored enterprise debt especially compelling, but it does make China's central bank a very attractive
buyer.
The People's Bank of China as America's lender of last resort? Now that really would give Messrs Paulson and Bernanke food for thought.
.