The US and slavery

[BSAM]

Quote from jem:

Obama is in the white house because george bush and the neo con republicans sucked. Our country is not leftist.

the leftists got a chance,they failed... they will be voted out.

I agree with your first sentence here, Jem.
Not so sure about the rest of your statements.
Mitt Romney ain't exactly my idea of a conservative.
Mitt Romney has proven himself to be pretty leftist.
This country has become liberal / leftist.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Mercor:

What these records show is that the modern slave trade flourished in the early middle ages, as early as 869, especially between Muslim traders and western African kingdoms. For moralists, the most important aspect of that trade should be that Muslims were selling goods to the African kingdoms and the African kingdoms were paying with their own people. In most instances, no violence was necessary to obtain those slaves. Contrary to legends and novels and Hollywood movies, the white traders did not need to savagely kill entire tribes in order to exact their tribute in slaves. All they needed to do is bring goods that appealed to the kings of those tribes. The kings would gladly sell their own subjects. (Of course, this neither condones the white traders who bought the slaves nor deny that many white traders still committed atrocities to maximize their business).
This explains why slavery became "black". Ancient slavery, e.g. under the Roman empire, would not discriminate: slaves were both white and black (so were Emperors and Popes). In the middle ages, all European countries outlawed slavery (of course, Western powers retained countless "civilized" ways to enslave their citizens, but that's another story), whereas the African kingdoms happily continued in their trade. Therefore, only colored people could be slaves, and that is how the stereotype for African-American slavery was born. It was not based on an ancestral hatred of blacks by whites, but simply on the fact that blacks were the only ones selling slaves, and they were selling people of their own race.
http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/slavetra.html

I just love factual history, well that and the sound of crickets chirping from the left after someone has posted said history.

 

[denner]

Quote from Ricter:

And then the reps will fail and be voted out and the libs voted back in. That's history for ya.

Can't argue your point. Politics, culture, leadership have been circling the drain for quite awhile now. My personal take is that it's more of a generational issue and these things are pretty cyclical...i.e. succeeding generations will typically act in defiance of the "values" held dear to the preceeding generation...

 

[Ricter]

Quote from denner:

Can't argue your point. Politics, culture, leadership have been circling the drain for quite awhile now. My personal take is that it's more of a generational issue and these things are pretty cyclical...i.e. succeeding generations will typically act in defiance of the "values" held dear to the preceeding generation...

Definitely some of the latter in the mix, yes.

I think the division goes much further back. How long have the strong dominated the weak? How long have the weak been massing and protesting the strong? How many dissenters have had their heads put on spikes? How many of the privileged have had their heads dropped into baskets?

 

[RCG Trader]

Quote from Mercor:

What these records show is that the modern slave trade flourished in the early middle ages, as early as 869, especially between Muslim traders and western African kingdoms. For moralists, the most important aspect of that trade should be that Muslims were selling goods to the African kingdoms and the African kingdoms were paying with their own people. In most instances, no violence was necessary to obtain those slaves. Contrary to legends and novels and Hollywood movies, the white traders did not need to savagely kill entire tribes in order to exact their tribute in slaves. All they needed to do is bring goods that appealed to the kings of those tribes. The kings would gladly sell their own subjects. (Of course, this neither condones the white traders who bought the slaves nor deny that many white traders still committed atrocities to maximize their business).
This explains why slavery became "black". Ancient slavery, e.g. under the Roman empire, would not discriminate: slaves were both white and black (so were Emperors and Popes). In the middle ages, all European countries outlawed slavery (of course, Western powers retained countless "civilized" ways to enslave their citizens, but that's another story), whereas the African kingdoms happily continued in their trade. Therefore, only colored people could be slaves, and that is how the stereotype for African-American slavery was born. It was not based on an ancestral hatred of blacks by whites, but simply on the fact that blacks were the only ones selling slaves, and they were selling people of their own race.
http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/slavetra.html

This is correct, further, slaves were sold sometimes as cheaply as for a case of alcohol. Dunno how much alcohol cost back them, but the records exist.

 

[Mercor]

Quote from RCG Trader:

This is correct, further, slaves were sold sometimes as cheaply as for a case of alcohol. Dunno how much alcohol cost back them, but the records exist.

And think in this day, our society still has parts of its population considered just property of its owner.
A fetus from 1-90 days.
At 91 days a fetus starts to get some due process rights just like any citizen.

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from RCG Trader:

This is correct, further, slaves were sold sometimes as cheaply as for a case of alcohol. Dunno how much alcohol cost back them, but the records exist.

wow talk about over paying:eek:

 

[murray t turtle]

Quote from mike oxbig:

Anytime African slavery is mentioned, the focus is always on America. Let's shed a little historical light on the situation. The Arabs began the African slave trade in East Africa hundreds of years before the Europeans began the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. Estimates are that Arab slave traders shipped and sold 10 to 18 million Africans in middle eastern and North African markets. By comparison, it is estimated that 12 million African slaves crossed the Atlantic. The Atlantic slave traders, ordered by trade volume, were: the Portuguese, the British, the French, the Spanish, the Dutch, and the Americans. Only 3.25% of African slaves ended up in North American English colonies. The vast majority ended up on sugar plantations in Brazil and the Caribbean (Cuba, Haiti, Dominican Republic, East and West Indies, etc.). The remainder were imported into other South American countries by the Spanish and French.

Re;Redemption/Religion & Politics

And dont ever forget how the lamebrain/loons/left tried to in his own words''lynch an uppity black man'' Supreme court justice Clarence Thomas said concerning the left lamebrain loons.

I wouyld also like to see some justice for all the black conservatives;
the Supreme court hang/strangle the Dem gov grab of health care

One Bible Black preacher[Rev E,V Hill] said while he wouldn't have picked a slave ship to be his favorite way of transport; he was thankful to be in America.Thank God for conservative Black preachers

Contrast that with the stuck on slave trader/snarler/friend of Farakhan/antisemite / Rev Wright,Senator Barack's Pastor for many years.Chickens can come home to roost

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from jem:

Obama is in the white house because george bush and the neo con republicans sucked. Our country is not leftist.

the leftists got a chance,they failed... they will be voted out.

Purely wishful thinking socialism is well entrenched in our society.

 

[peilthetraveler]

http://www.alternet.org/world/142171/there_are_more_slaves_today_than_at_any_time_in_human_history/

There are more slaves today than anytime throughout human history.

Isnt that interesting that slavery INCREASED after it was made illegal. Hmm.