Read the wording of your post:
So, how many dead people voted, and how many did so year after year? At least make a case for materiality if you're going to raise the issue.
The Trump Files
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
Can you believe many Republicans are saying this ?.?
This is sure to really piss Trump off.
---------------------------------------------------
If she wins, Clinton would enter office with low favorability ratings and only one-third of voters considering her “honest and trustworthy.” As a result, Republicans are not inclined to give her a political honeymoon. To many of them, a Clinton victory would mean that Trump threw away an election that anyone else could have won.
“This should have been a slam dunk for the GOP,” party consultant Frank Luntz said Sunday on CBS News’s “Face the Nation.”
House Republicans are already preparing for ‘years’ of investigations of Clinton
SOUTH JORDAN, Utah — Jason Chaffetz, the Utah congressman wrapping up his first term atop the powerful House Oversight Committee, unendorsed Donald Trump weeks ago. That freed him up to prepare for something else: spending years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton.
“It’s a target-rich environment,” the Republican said in an interview in Salt Lake City’s suburbs. “Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...medium=referral&utm_source=huffingtonpost.com
This is sure to really piss Trump off.
---------------------------------------------------
If she wins, Clinton would enter office with low favorability ratings and only one-third of voters considering her “honest and trustworthy.” As a result, Republicans are not inclined to give her a political honeymoon. To many of them, a Clinton victory would mean that Trump threw away an election that anyone else could have won.
“This should have been a slam dunk for the GOP,” party consultant Frank Luntz said Sunday on CBS News’s “Face the Nation.”
House Republicans are already preparing for ‘years’ of investigations of Clinton
SOUTH JORDAN, Utah — Jason Chaffetz, the Utah congressman wrapping up his first term atop the powerful House Oversight Committee, unendorsed Donald Trump weeks ago. That freed him up to prepare for something else: spending years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton.
“It’s a target-rich environment,” the Republican said in an interview in Salt Lake City’s suburbs. “Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...medium=referral&utm_source=huffingtonpost.com
Go read the other thread and find out.
Yeah, you don't know either, eh?
A quick look through the thread and I saw instances of caught irregularities. Caught. So the system...works?
The article in the starting post outlines dead people voting in multiple election years. Is this merely an irregularity? It was only caught years after it was done when someone cross-referenced voting records and death certificates.
Again, give me a hard number of actual fraudulent votes rather than fraudulent attempts that were thwarted. I don't doubt that there are some, just as I don't doubt there are Powerball winners. The question is, How many?
Trump attacks the military,
Trump attacks coalition battle to reclaim ISIS-held Mosul
Trump criticized the coalition’s Iraqi-led assault on Mosul, the last ISIS stronghold in Iraq.
“Boy, oh boy. What a bunch of amateurs,” Trump said.
Retired U.S. Army War College Dean and CBS News military consultant Jeff McCausland said Trump’s ideas about fighting show he “doesn’t know a damn thing about military strategy.”
“Some clown from some institute came out today ‘why is Donald Trump saying that about Mosul?’ Hey folks, I will put my thought process against these people any time,” Trump said.
In an ABC interview, Trump’s know-it-all streak came through.
“Why can’t they win first, and talk later? Why do they have to say three months before the attack we are going in? So, you can tell your military expert that I’ll sit down and I’ll teach him a couple of things,” Trump said.
Trump attacks coalition battle to reclaim ISIS-held Mosul
Trump criticized the coalition’s Iraqi-led assault on Mosul, the last ISIS stronghold in Iraq.
“Boy, oh boy. What a bunch of amateurs,” Trump said.
Retired U.S. Army War College Dean and CBS News military consultant Jeff McCausland said Trump’s ideas about fighting show he “doesn’t know a damn thing about military strategy.”
“Some clown from some institute came out today ‘why is Donald Trump saying that about Mosul?’ Hey folks, I will put my thought process against these people any time,” Trump said.
In an ABC interview, Trump’s know-it-all streak came through.
“Why can’t they win first, and talk later? Why do they have to say three months before the attack we are going in? So, you can tell your military expert that I’ll sit down and I’ll teach him a couple of things,” Trump said.
Is there nothing that Trump will admit to knowing nothing about? Which is nearly everything?
Homeland Security chair: I told Donald Trump that Russia was behind hacks
House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul said Tuesday he told Donald Trump that Russia was trying to influence the election through hacking, but the GOP presidential nominee rejected that information.
During an event hosted by The Texas Tribune, moderator CEO Evan Smith recounted that McCaul had told The Dallas Morning News recently that he personally briefed Trump on Russia’s actions. But then Trump, at the third presidential debate, said that no one knows for sure that Russia was behind the cyberattacks.
“I think he has in his mind that there’s not the proof,” McCaul, a Trump supporter, said at the event in Austin, according to video obtained by Politico. “Now he hasn’t had the briefing I’ve had, but I made it clear that in my judgment it was a nation-state.”
At the final debate in Las Vegas last week, Trump expressed doubt that Russia was responsible for hacks into U.S. election systems, campaigns and political groups.
“She has no idea whether it’s Russia, China, or anybody else,” Trump said. “Hillary, you have no idea.”
House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul said Tuesday he told Donald Trump that Russia was trying to influence the election through hacking, but the GOP presidential nominee rejected that information.
During an event hosted by The Texas Tribune, moderator CEO Evan Smith recounted that McCaul had told The Dallas Morning News recently that he personally briefed Trump on Russia’s actions. But then Trump, at the third presidential debate, said that no one knows for sure that Russia was behind the cyberattacks.
“I think he has in his mind that there’s not the proof,” McCaul, a Trump supporter, said at the event in Austin, according to video obtained by Politico. “Now he hasn’t had the briefing I’ve had, but I made it clear that in my judgment it was a nation-state.”
At the final debate in Las Vegas last week, Trump expressed doubt that Russia was responsible for hacks into U.S. election systems, campaigns and political groups.
“She has no idea whether it’s Russia, China, or anybody else,” Trump said. “Hillary, you have no idea.”