The Trump Files
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
The lesser of two evils.
✔@realDonaldTrump
Attention all hackers: You are hacking everything else so please hack Obama's college records (destroyed?) and check "place of birth"
Follow
Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump
An 'extremely credible source' has called my office and told me that @BarackObama's birth certificate is a fraud.
Attention all hackers: You are hacking everything else so please hack Obama's college records (destroyed?) and check "place of birth"
Follow
Donald J. Trump✔@realDonaldTrump
An 'extremely credible source' has called my office and told me that @BarackObama's birth certificate is a fraud.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump...-believes-obama-born-073502901--election.html
So now Trump says that Obama WAS born in the US.
"After five years as the chief promoter of the false idea that Barack Obama wasn't born in the United States, Donald Trump reversed course and admitted on Friday that the president was — and then claimed credit for putting the issue to rest."
So now Trump says that Obama WAS born in the US.
"After five years as the chief promoter of the false idea that Barack Obama wasn't born in the United States, Donald Trump reversed course and admitted on Friday that the president was — and then claimed credit for putting the issue to rest."
Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban has pitched a $10 million deal toRepublican presidential nominee Donald Trump.
In return for a four-hour interview, Cuban said he would cut a check to Trump's charity of choice. Cuban has publicly endorsed Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and has been a vocal critic of Trump.
Follow
Mark Cuban
✔@mcuban
.1) @realDonaldTrump $10mm to the charity of YOUR choice if you let ME interview you for 4 hrs on YOUR policies and their substance.
11:19 AM - 16 Sep 2016
Ground rules of the interview are that Trump would have to focus on "the details and facts" of his policies, Cuban tweeted.
In return for a four-hour interview, Cuban said he would cut a check to Trump's charity of choice. Cuban has publicly endorsed Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and has been a vocal critic of Trump.
Follow
Mark Cuban ✔@mcuban
.1) @realDonaldTrump $10mm to the charity of YOUR choice if you let ME interview you for 4 hrs on YOUR policies and their substance.
11:19 AM - 16 Sep 2016
Ground rules of the interview are that Trump would have to focus on "the details and facts" of his policies, Cuban tweeted.
Oh man!!! These elections are becoming more and more funnier.
Now people are throwing money at Trump for him to release his tax returns, when in the past from finding out about the history of the US elections, all candidates have to release their tax returns! When I think in some EU countries, one can not even present himself/herself for public office without releasing tax returns!
And now, people are ready to throw money at Trump for him to talk about "details and facts"!!!!
Now people are throwing money at Trump for him to release his tax returns, when in the past from finding out about the history of the US elections, all candidates have to release their tax returns! When I think in some EU countries, one can not even present himself/herself for public office without releasing tax returns!
And now, people are ready to throw money at Trump for him to talk about "details and facts"!!!!
The W. Bush years were based on Trickle down economics. This lead ultimately to the greatest recession in modern history.
TRICKLE-DOWN ECONOMICS: FOUR REASONS WHY IT JUST DOESN'T WORK
By Mehrun Etebari
July 17, 2003
We've all heard the claims that cutting tax rates for the richest Americans will improve the standard of living for the working class. Supposedly, top-bracket tax breaks will result in more jobs being created, higher wages for the average worker, and an overall upturn in our economy. It's at the heart of the infamous trickle-down theory.
The past 40 years have seen a gradual decrease in the top bracket's income tax rate, from 91% in 1963 to 35% in 2003. It went as low as 28% in 1988 and 1989 due to legislation passed under Reagan, the trickle-down theory's most famous adherent. The Clinton years saw the top bracket hold steady at a higher rate of 39.6%, but under the younger Bush's tax-cut policies, the rich are once again paying less. The drastic change in tax policy that has taken place since the early 1960s gives us a great opportunity to study and evaluate the claims that lower taxes for the rich translate to more wealth for the average American.
We can compare changes in the top tax rate with the real GDP growth rate (a measure of the growth of the entire U.S. economy), and three measures of how life is for the average working American: annual median income growth, annual average hourly wage growth, and job creation. If cuts for the rich were really the magic elixir for the economy and the middle class that the Republican consensus claims it is, we would see an increase in the four indicators whenever the tax rate dropped. However, this is not the case. Such a trend occurs sometimes, but the opposite happens at other times!
Let's look one by one at comparisons of key economic indicators to the top tax rate.
1. Cutting the top tax rate does not lead to economic growth.
...
http://www.faireconomy.org/trickle_down_economics_four_reasons
TRICKLE-DOWN ECONOMICS: FOUR REASONS WHY IT JUST DOESN'T WORK
By Mehrun Etebari
July 17, 2003
We've all heard the claims that cutting tax rates for the richest Americans will improve the standard of living for the working class. Supposedly, top-bracket tax breaks will result in more jobs being created, higher wages for the average worker, and an overall upturn in our economy. It's at the heart of the infamous trickle-down theory.
The past 40 years have seen a gradual decrease in the top bracket's income tax rate, from 91% in 1963 to 35% in 2003. It went as low as 28% in 1988 and 1989 due to legislation passed under Reagan, the trickle-down theory's most famous adherent. The Clinton years saw the top bracket hold steady at a higher rate of 39.6%, but under the younger Bush's tax-cut policies, the rich are once again paying less. The drastic change in tax policy that has taken place since the early 1960s gives us a great opportunity to study and evaluate the claims that lower taxes for the rich translate to more wealth for the average American.
We can compare changes in the top tax rate with the real GDP growth rate (a measure of the growth of the entire U.S. economy), and three measures of how life is for the average working American: annual median income growth, annual average hourly wage growth, and job creation. If cuts for the rich were really the magic elixir for the economy and the middle class that the Republican consensus claims it is, we would see an increase in the four indicators whenever the tax rate dropped. However, this is not the case. Such a trend occurs sometimes, but the opposite happens at other times!
Let's look one by one at comparisons of key economic indicators to the top tax rate.
1. Cutting the top tax rate does not lead to economic growth.
...
http://www.faireconomy.org/trickle_down_economics_four_reasons
