Nitro, just because you may be a Marxist doesn't mean you can't make trenchant observations. I actually agree with you on the issue of dividing the spoils of our capitalist system. I would phrase it differently, but we agree its not equitable for virtually all increases in the country's wealth be grabbed by those at the very top. But I see it mainly as an issue of corporate governance. As much as I hate to advocate for the government to regulate salaries, the current system has gone off the rails. Maybe we legislate a maximum CEO to entry level salary multiple. That would give them an incentive to raise entry level salaries.
We need a law that if the government bails your company out, the top execs all get fired, no exceptions, and they are referred for criminal investigation.
We know traditional Bush republicans will never go for this kind of stuff. That's a big reason we are done with them.
Or maybe we reform the central bank policy of targeting asset prices. (Granted, it can only work if all central banks faced similar pressures and reforms). You will notice that this ratio of avg worker to CEO pay went parabolic around the time stock prices also went parabolic.
I'd also argue that the "merger's trend" over how many years now has reduced competition dramatically giving those remaining conglomerate's near monopoly status (hence outsized CEO compensation). A more vigorous application of anti-trust and/or vigilance in preventing all of these mini-monopolies forming and creating absurdly predatory pricing.