As of this moment, the scribble method has neither made, nor lost any money as no trades have been placed.
If one knows the rules, there's no need to announce the trades. If one doesn't understand the rules, there would be no point in doing so. Hindsight charts have been posted, of course, along with the hindsight charts provided by the OP, such as those above. The difference is that the SLA trades are determined by rules; the "grail" trades are determined by who-knows-what.
And it's well to remember that since the OP has at least me on Ignore, he has no way of knowing what's been posted and what hasn't. And since he hasn't read the material and thus has no idea what the SLA rules are . . .
Anyone who wants to believe that the "grail" system is superior to the SLA is welcome to do so. Makes no difference to me. It's not my money. And if one can in reality tolerate the drawdowns, why not? But those who are tempted should understand that a rules-based system need not suffer any drawdowns at all. That the "grail" system does so indicates the complete lack of any sort of trading plan beyond Guess&Hope. As for "scribbles", what better example of scribbles than the indicators of which the OP is so fond. But at least they enable him to make notations regarding what he would have done, or claims to have done, long before the chart is ever posted.
Not impressed. But at least he's stopped pulling the posts and charts of those who are -- or at least were, before his trolling -- trying to learn the SLA out of their journals and reposting them here for the sole purpose of ridiculing them. That's progress of a sort (I'll assume that he was "encouraged" to stop this pre-school practice).