The Trouble With Scribbles

[dbphoenix]

I see only one of the interested folks is hanging around, but I'll point out this little range between 2 and 6.

 

[k p]

I see only one of the interested folks is hanging around, but I'll point out this little range between 2 and 6.

Wow... a post to point out a range after its already on the chart.. incredible! Let me guess... go long above 6 and short below 2?

 

[toucan]

And you continue to reword my replies so that they reflect what you want them to say.

If you were genuinely interested in the material, you'd study it. But you're not. So you engage in this pest thing. Productive.

actually, i find amt and what you put on your charts very interesting... I don't need to study what you wrote as I am a different trader than you... I find that sla is too lagging and too subjective, but thats just me and the way that i trade.

and I wouldn't have continued posting, but you needed to respond to my reply to K P. and then i posted again, and then you... and so on

 

[dbphoenix]

And we fail to make a higher high, so price trades sideways between 1 and 7. The break, therefore, does not lead to disaster but to a different behavior.

 

[samuel11]

True, the chief difference being that he's made less than 20pts so far and the SLA/AMT has made over 160. So his argument about the superiority of his grail method leaves something to be desired.

It looks like “the SLA/AMT has made over 160” is conveniently calculated AFTER the facts, since DB admitted he did not make 160 himself.

 

[dbphoenix]

It looks like “the SLA/AMT has made over 160” is conveniently calculated AFTER the facts, since DB admitted he did not make 160 himself.

Tough to do it before the fact.

 

[k p]

and I wouldn't have continued posting, but you needed to respond to my reply to K P. and then i posted again, and then you... and so on

Deep down inside he wants to respond to me... this is why he even calls me a troll and says I'm filling up the thread. But to respond to me directly, this would actually eat him up inside. So instead, he does this in a round about way, much like all his answers... all round about.

I still don't have a problem with you Db. I still think you're great, and I still think you're smart, and I still think you're a market wizard. But without any demonstration of how one does this in real time, even better, what you're doing with this in real, all we can conclude is that you're an expert hindsight chartist. And that don't pay my bills.

 

[samuel11]

Tough to do it before the fact.

Haha I recognize the alleged snake salesman here.

Your “SLA/AMT” did not make 160 pts as you claimed, otherwise I am sure you would not have said that you did not on post 727.

 

[Eddiemorra]

I made a mess of things today, but just to make sure i'm not completely off-track, how does this look?

 

[dbphoenix]

Haha I recognize the alleged snake salesman here.

Your “SLA/AMT” did not make 160 pts as you claimed, otherwise I am sure you would not have said that you did not on post 727.

Not sure what you're going for here but if one knows the rules, and I've posted them umpteen times, all he has to do is apply them to any chart and determine the gross yield. The approach is not responsible for any individual trader's failure to take the trade. For that you need an automated system.