The Toronto Story could Be Huge (Up Mahrams Ass)

How many drunk drivers kill 3000 people at once?




Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Let's say 1% of all drivers on the road are drunk drivers, who may kill you.

Do you:

1. Stop driving?
2. Start drinking and driving too?
3. Ignore the problem because America is a country that likes to drink, and the alcohol lobby is just too damn strong?
4. Enact legislation requiring all vehicles be fitted/retrofitted with devices that connect the ignition to a built-in breathalyzer?
5. Give each drunk driver the death penalty?


How come we have a war against drugs, against terrorism, when alcohol abuse, directly or indirectly kills hundreds of thousands each year?

Yes, this point is 100% strawman, but it does go to show that in this country we are really not about elimination of risk of life, or injury to life, we are about control of the lifestyle we choose, which has everything to do with the selling and marketing of "legal" means of risk....


How about this, ala Ann Couter:

Drunk Drivers: Convert them to sobriety, or kill them....

In my mind, the terrorist have won already, because they have generated sufficient fear to control behavior, start unnecessary wars, put us in debt, and re-elect moron presidents....
 
3,000 at once or 3,000 a year, what is the difference....

3,000 in one day=3,000 dead in a year
3,000 in one year=3,000 dead in a year

Quote from sputdr:

How many drunk drivers kill 3000 people at once?
 
Quote from Pabst:
How many Canadians have smugly bragged that their Islamic population was law abiding and thriving , all because of Canada's dovish stance in the Middle East.
Huh? I spend a lot of time in Canada (since I live here) and I have yet to hear one person, either to my face or in any of the media, say anything like this!! Can you provide us with a citation? By saying 'How many Canadians have...' you are implying that it is commonplace for Canadians to say that we are less susceptible because of... what, our 'dovish' stance vis-a-vis the Middle East??

First of all, our stance re: the invasion of Iraq and our stance re: terrorism are different, okay? Pabst, you're not famous for reflection, but let me assure you, the average Canadian, on both the right and left, feels the same about these thugs - hang 'em high. Just wait and see what the reaction is up here. I guarantee you that Canada will wake up tomorrow morning shifted over to the right.
Quote from Pabst:
Has Israel not reached a point where although they know that many Palestinians are nonviolent one can't reasonably ascertain who is violent?
Yes. But you see, Pabst, being a rational thinker involves the rejection of a withdrawal into stereotyping. Yes, what you say is true, but it is nevertheless our responsibility to fight against the tendency to FAIL to give every INDIVIDUAL the opportunity to prove his or her worth. It is a very tough burden to bear, I know. But if you don't have the moral strength to bear it, you end up with statements like

"35% of Black people are assholes"

Do you see the connection? Citizens subjected to this kind of thing have lost their liberty, which is something that is guaranteed in your Constitution, I think.

Very tough to take, I know. Much easier to just brand a symbol into their foreheads so we know every one of them and we can keep an eye on every one of them. That would achieve better results, clearly. If we treat every Negro as a potential asshole, we will avoid being 'assholed upon' by the ones that actually are assholes. Much better results, no?

Right...
 
Quote from Pabst:

The day the left realizes this has NEVER been about policy but ALWAYS about religion is the day we make progress in defending our future.

Is it possible... that you believe... that the actions of terrorists and those that train them are informed by theology?

Not sure if you will be able to understand this, but if that is what you believe, you are doomed.

Do I want to explain what it really is? I think the job has already been done, better than I could do it. But I can tell you what it's really about in one word. Religion? No.

It's about power.
 
Hardly.
Quote from traderNik:

Do I want to explain what it really is? I think the job has already been done, better than I could do it. But I can tell you what it's really about in one word. Religion? No.

It's about power.
 
Quote from traderNik:

Religion? No.

It's about power.

I think it's about both - they are using their religion to achieve power and dominance.
 
Quote from sputdr:

How many drunk drivers kill 3000 people at once?

Big deal, not even a drop in the bucket. Terrorism is <b>overrated</b>. Thousands of humans die every day, and rarely does anyone give a shit except for the relatives.

By the way, I caught a bit of Fox News over the weekend. What is the deal with a news alert every 3 seconds? I had heart palpitations after two minutes -- no wonder everyone is scared shitless. Fox is definitely for the scared pussy crowd, and they're going to stay scared because nobody is ever safe -- nobody will ever completely secure your borders; nobody will ever protect you from disease and disaster; nobody will ever prevent you from possibly dying a horrible death in a car wreck.

Life is a risk, so get busy livin' or get busy dyin' (name that movie), you motherfucking security pussies.
 
Quote from jem:

...Now you tell me why you wish to equate Muslim Fundamentalism to say some other fundamentalism. Are fundamentalists in baseball problematic? ...

Actually, now that you mention it, I'd be more afraid at a typical soccer final these days.
 
Back
Top