Wallett,Quote from Wallet:
Stu,
I am fully aware of the debate. While there are writers of the time that one would assume should have mentioned Jesus and do not, there ARE period texts that mention and name Jesus as Christus as some of his disciples along with accounts of his life and death, I'd suggest that you do some research.
Understand that at the time Jesus was of little significance historically in reference to the Roman empire.
You are both right and wrong in your assumption of Bible literacy.
God's measure in judgment is perfection, as yes the only way we can enter into heaven by our own accord is by living a perfect life.
But by his mercy he throws us a lifeline, a way to atone for our sins when we fail.
If perfection by our own works was the only way, He would not have made provisions for a sacrifice.
You may lead a good life by your own account, but not by God's perfect standard, no one was ever gone through life without one impure thought or action, and one slip up is all it takes to knock us from the realm of perfection.
But it's not my rules, they are His and this is what the debate is about, God's Sovereignty and our subjection to Him.
regards
In response to your points in their order.
There âAREâ period texts of Sherlock Holmes, but that doesn't make him a real person. Some people writing about a fictional Jesus as a so called 'Christus' and his disciples does not make any of them real or actual.
There are proven methods to declare events and people as real and historical, and Bible Jesus doesn't even start to meet them.
The main reason Jesus was of little significance historically in reference to the Roman empire would be because bible Jesus didn't exist.
Literal in this context is not about being right and wrong. You cannot sensibly say something supposed to be instructional is to be taken literally one minute and figuratively the next as a mood takes.
However, it is the format for fairy tales.
There is no measure of perfection unless it is perfect evil that warrants pushing someone who cannot swim off the side of a boat into the sea and then telling them they will be thrown a life line only if they slavishly worship.
That is fundamentally immoral and violates most of the accepted principles of right and wrong. Whether or not the something's name said to be doing it is God.
There was no sacrifice. There is no such thing as death happening, when in a story someone is going to live again in 3 days.
The loathful crucifixion is nothing more than a grotesque story about fraudulently forcing repellant, unwanted and unasked for conditions onto people and then making unsupported and untrustworthy promises about getting them taken away again.
Anywhere else but in a bible you would get a life term in prison for conspiring to carry out such an abominable enterprise..
They are your rules. They are the rules you decided to swallow for no good reason other than a superstitious fear and the cheap irrational sense for a fictitious salvation.
best wishes
stu