The Three levels of chart reading proficiency.

Level 4: Program a base template to read the chart and generate trading signals for you

Level 5: Parameterize all sensitivity variables which will generate the number of trading signals to align with your desired amount of trading activity

Level 6: Be able to recognize optimal settings of all sensitivity variables for each new chart that you pulllup on every timeframe and asset class.

I am currently working on level 6, but what comes after that?
 
It seems there is a lot of confusion about chart reading enough that people are posting ridiculous threads.

The key to trading is that the information must be actionable. Knowing something 2 minutes after the fact is not actionable 2 minutes ago, unless you have a time machine.

The 3 levels of proficiency.

Level 1) Can read a chart after the fact. This is the beginner level. You can pick apart the details and know what to do after the fact. Everyone needs to start somewhere, and this is a good place to start. But this information is not that valuable.

Furthermore, you can create enough hard "rules", after the fact, to apply them consistently to other charts, after the fact*. If you cannot do this, do not go to level 2.

Level 2) Can read a chart in real time, but you have an infinite amount of time to do your analysis. Time is frozen. This is intermediate skill level. Your skill is still bareley actionable still, because you are taking too much time, and frankly, time and markets do not stand still. You will fall behind, get exhausted and make mistakes.

Level 3) Can read a chart in real time, and can make decisions in real time about trading orders, actions etc. Now you are proficient. You can keep up with the markets. You can filter out the noise from the signal, in real-time. You have enough time to make your trading choices and get them to the broker and exchange. Now you are trading.

Furthermore, you can keep on doing this real time analysis bar after bar, minute by minute, hour by hour until the trading day ends.

I hope this clears some things up.

*This is where most of the silly threads end. They cannot even make up testable rules using charts after the fact. They are not even in the parking lot, let alone in the game. To say otherwise, is to show their secondary, and deadly, short coming: Way overestimating their skills.

Level 4, anticipate one to several possibilities that may happen and know the answers before the question.
 
Too many damn loonies these day throwing good money for worthless things. Why not donate that money to help starving children in Africa FFS?!! Consumerism at its worst.
The problem with donating that money to help starving children in Africa is once that money is spent, they will starve again so unless we keep donating it won't solve the problem.

Actually consumerism keeps the world employed, prosperous and high tide lifts all boats. With prosperity spreading jobs around, perhaps the Africans can get jobs and feed their family.

Case in point, China's biggest problem these days is their citizens do not consume, as a result, shops closed, lots of folks lost their job, undercutting to push exports and makes the world mad at them. A vicious cycle hurting everybody.

Of course it is oversimplification but we need @wxytrader to buy his Lambo and someone else their 60's bugs.
 
It depends on time frames also, as not everyone are lower time frame preference.
When using 4 hour and 1 hour charts, 2 minutes is not an issue.
Not only that, but some systems that work in one time frame fail in others. One would think that all time frames are bound by the same movements, and thus the same principles, but that is categorically false.
 
Not only that, but some systems that work in one time frame fail in others. One would think that all time frames are bound by the same movements, and thus the same principles, but that is categorically false.
Are you saying the market price PA is actually not fractal?
 
Are you saying the market price PA is actually not fractal?
Within a bounded system, that is correct. If you create a system that reacts a certain way to price action on one time frame with a high probability of success, that same probability of success may not exist on a different time frame.
 
It seems there is a lot of confusion about chart reading enough that people are posting ridiculous threads.

The key to trading is that the information must be actionable. Knowing something 2 minutes after the fact is not actionable 2 minutes ago, unless you have a time machine.

The 3 levels of proficiency.

Level 1) Can read a chart after the fact. This is the beginner level. You can pick apart the details and know what to do after the fact. Everyone needs to start somewhere, and this is a good place to start. But this information is not that valuable.

Furthermore, you can create enough hard "rules", after the fact, to apply them consistently to other charts, after the fact*. If you cannot do this, do not go to level 2.

Level 2) Can read a chart in real time, but you have an infinite amount of time to do your analysis. Time is frozen. This is intermediate skill level. Your skill is still bareley actionable still, because you are taking too much time, and frankly, time and markets do not stand still. You will fall behind, get exhausted and make mistakes.

Level 3) Can read a chart in real time, and can make decisions in real time about trading orders, actions etc. Now you are proficient. You can keep up with the markets. You can filter out the noise from the signal, in real-time. You have enough time to make your trading choices and get them to the broker and exchange. Now you are trading.

Furthermore, you can keep on doing this real time analysis bar after bar, minute by minute, hour by hour until the trading day ends.

I hope this clears some things up.

*This is where most of the silly threads end. They cannot even make up testable rules using charts after the fact. They are not even in the parking lot, let alone in the game. To say otherwise, is to show their secondary, and deadly, short coming: Way overestimating their skills.
I'm not sure where do I fall.

I believe the only accurate benchmark to measure a trader is net profit and loss.

Another belief of mine is, assume two traders run a similar trading system (got +ve expectancy), the trader who has lower profit may have lack understanding of the system or discipline or psychology issue.
 
Level 4, anticipate one to several possibilities that may happen and know the answers before the question.

Oh you get praise for this comment, but I show multiple scenarios that can play out on a chart and I get criticized???!!!

Look at the bias!

upload_2024-9-16_9-5-28.png
 
Level 4: Program a base template to read the chart and generate trading signals for you

Level 5: Parameterize all sensitivity variables which will generate the number of trading signals to align with your desired amount of trading activity

Level 6: Be able to recognize optimal settings of all sensitivity variables for each new chart that you pulllup on every timeframe and asset class.

I am currently working on level 6, but what comes after that?

Elliott Wave comes after that. :)
 
Back
Top