
Fascinating. Not that I really understood what you were talking about, but this is an excerpt from that other post of yours in that other thread:Quote from JimmyJam:
There is an inverse relationship to the performance bond used and number of contracts traded, and the % return using this method of trading...
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1689757#post1689757Quote from JimmyJam:
...d) scalability is determined by managing the risk respresented by each contract, not by increasing the number of contracts according to the performance bond...
Quote from JimmyJam:
Done and done earlier today.
The key to taking consistent profits out of the market is to quit when you're ahead ... you're welcome.![]()
![]()
![]()
JJ
P.S. You guys really don't know shit around here, do you?![]()

Quote from Thunderdog:
Fascinating. Not that I really understood what you were talking about, but this is an excerpt from that other post of your in that other thread:
Kindly try to decide what you are talking about and then see if you can stick with it.
Quote from overtooled:
the market is tanking, and your not banking, your done??
the days only half over!
you better quit because you'll just give it all back, sooner or later ROFL. ok sleprock![]()
"Numbnick?" I didn't think we reached that stage in our relationship where we would be exchanging terms of endearment, JimmyToeJam. Regardless, I think you are living in a world entirely of your own construct.* Here's hoping that you BE-DO-HAVE everything you wish for.Quote from JimmyJam:
LOL, both are true numbnick.
The statments apply to completely different things, however, they are consistent in their logic.
The basic performance bond increases as you increase contract size (hence the inverse relationship statement), and the amount of performance bond required for the increase in contracts is determined by the tolereance for risk of the individual trader (hence the risk management statement).
Schools In Session
![]()
JJ
