Quote from atticus:
I'm a recent expat from the SI and iHub boards and admit I haven't read this journal thoroughly, but it seems to me that the author is paper-trading these assets and riding large drawdowns, only to revisit the trade if it achieves paper-profitability.
Do you often take risk that exceed 1:1 risk-reward?
all trades are presented, win or lose.
i appreciate your name knowing, shall we say, several "employees" of the fund reflected in you name. are you associated with them? may i suggest that you read the report in total prior to commenting.
as the readers know, yes, in 2006 we did have some issues with style drift and unsuccessful experimentation with new methods.
yes, at times, if the information/data remains the same we will average into a trade, taking on more than normal risk on a per trade basis, never on a portfolio basis. we don't take, nor accept as valid the commonly accepted risk-reward ratios on such trades-- but rather face larger drawdowns while managing the risk on a portfolio wide basis instead of on the micro level of an individual trade. i realize this would, at times, be difficult for the undercapitalized or hobbyist type trader.
regards,
surf
