Quote from marketsurfer:
no lies.
why would i lie? both the good and the poor trades are recorded for posterity. you are the only one who makes your record up as evidenced on your site for several years. perfect record, LMAO!!
stop trying to ride the PR wave on my coattails. do your own thing, and this time--DON"T make it up.
surfer
Quote from marketsurfer:
you need to learn to do research, i am not doing it for you. go to clearstation for instance, after you find a link on the search engine, then search for user name marketsurfer. its not hard.
please stay off my journal from here on out.
thank you
Quote from volente_00:
Do you do this in your journal ?
Quote from JimmyJam:
a) I haven't been asked to. BTW, your asking won't count ...
b) I actually put a lot of analyses together for surf just to see how the system does perform, and like I said, it was going pretty well until that confusing currency pair. :eek:
JJ
Hmm. I suppose it is a matter of perspective. Individual trades should be evaluated on their own merit, to be sure. But traders should probably not be evaluated in such isolation. Personally, I would think that a trader's performance is better evaluated by the sum of his trades rather than on any of his individual trades. With enough time, anyone can call a "good" trade. A successful trader is someone who is profitable on balance.Quote from volente_00:
I really don't care about the past, it is the point of the matter. All that really matters is the current trade, anyone who is a successful trader already knows this.