The Surf Report--part 2

Quote from traderchi128:

Mav saying you suggested shorting the stock at 2.00 is comical. I guess if someone asks me would if I would buy SP Futures up here at 1390 and I said no fucking way, that makes me short them?

Surf made a call at 2.50 or so. His post market fills are, most likely are a fantasy as he never stated any kind of price/shares. That on top of the fact the stock did not trade there for long makes his claim of a fill that caused his whole position to have "average of 2.00" a tall tale.
.
More...

No, please don't misstate posted facts. Shares were bought at 2.50, 2.00 and at 2,71-- the average price is not $2.00, although I wish it was! It is $2.40.

surf
 
Quote from traderchi128:

Mav saying you suggested shorting the stock at 2.00 is comical. I guess if someone asks me would if I would buy SP Futures up here at 1390 and I said no fucking way, that makes me short them?

Surf made a call at 2.50 or so. His post market fills are, most likely are a fantasy as he never stated any kind of price/shares. That on top of the fact the stock did not trade there for long makes his claim of a fill that caused his whole position to have "average of 2.00" a tall tale.

So at 3.00 it's profitable. Good trade so far. The problem is without any risk mgmt on the down side or an idea of where to take profits this trade is doomed.

He should have listened to his guy on the sidelines (I won't call him a cheerleader ) who told him to take some off after he achieved a 60% gain in a day or so.
More...


Why are you so f*cking heavily invested in this? Dude, I came on this thread as a 3rd party oberserver and called it like I saw it. Whether or not Surf made the trade is immaterial since everyone on ET is a billionaire.

I never said Sam shorted the stock at $2. Why the hell do you keep saying this? Whether or nor Sam ever took a trade is immaterial as is with Surf. What does matter is time stamping the call both guys made. Surf came on here and posted the trade "before" the fact. Or let's say the call, I'm not going to argue like a child if he ever took it. Sam said the stock was going to zero. He did not say he shorted it nor did I. But I have to time stamp his call don't I? Look, if he made that call when the stock was at $10 that's a damn good call even if it never goes to zero. But he didn't. He made the call when it was at $2!!!!!!!. The stock has since rallied 50% from when HE made that call.

He further stated it would be at zero on Friday. He could still be right. I never said he was wrong and I never said Surf was right. Your childish antics on this thread are growing old. If you don't like Surf, take that somewhere else. As to this trade, the "call" Surf made has held up so far. It may still go to zero. It may go to 10. I have no f*cking clue where it's going as you can throw the technicals out the window here.

The only statement I have made on this thread that was complementary was that at least Surf had asymmetry working for him. And he does!!!!! This harassment of others on ET is really growing old. You posted once you don't like the trade, move on. But find something better to do then defend another alias on here who also likes to run his mouth.
 
Quote from SamGold:

They call maverick the timestamper. Why?. Because he timestamps.

I bet he makes a lot of money timestamping.
More...

Hey dude, you made a bad call. Nothing I can do about it. Don't worry, nothing a new alias can't fix. :D
 
Quote from Maverick74:

Why are you so f*cking heavily invested in this? Dude, I came on this thread as a 3rd party oberserver and called it like I saw it. Whether or not Surf made the trade is immaterial since everyone on ET is a billionaire.

I never said Sam shorted the stock at $2. Why the hell do you keep saying this? Whether or nor Sam ever took a trade is immaterial as is with Surf. What does matter is time stamping the call both guys made. Surf came on here and posted the trade "before" the fact. Or let's say the call, I'm not going to argue like a child if he ever took it. Sam said the stock was going to zero. He did not say he shorted it nor did I. But I have to time stamp his call don't I? Look, if he made that call when the stock was at $10 that's a damn good call even if it never goes to zero. But he didn't. He made the call when it was at $2!!!!!!!. The stock has since rallied 50% from when HE made that call.

He further stated it would be at zero on Friday. He could still be right. I never said he was wrong and I never said Surf was right. Your childish antics on this thread are growing old. If you don't like Surf, take that somewhere else. As to this trade, the "call" Surf made has held up so far. It may still go to zero. It may go to 10. I have no f*cking clue where it's going as you can throw the technicals out the window here.

The only statement I have made on this thread that was complementary was that at least Surf had asymmetry working for him. And he does!!!!! This harassment of others on ET is really growing old. You posted once you don't like the trade, move on. But find something better to do then defend another alias on here who also likes to run his mouth.
More...

That time of the month huh?

So you claim he made a call of a stock going down, but now you backtrack saying you didn't say he was short. You should become a politician.
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

No, please don't misstate posted facts. Shares were bought at 2.50, 2.00 and at 2,71-- the average price is not $2.00, although I wish it was! It is $2.40.

surf
More...


08-02-12 04:35 PM

Quote from marketsurfer:

Stepping in here bought small position of Knight Capital at $2.50

Will average down 2 X if needed to build full position.


Surf



Averaged in at $2.00

surf



From the post it seems you are implying your position is at an average of 2.00.

But I can see how it could be two prices.


Anyways...good luck with it. I'd better stop posting before Mav has a fucking heart attack :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top