I understand the basis of the study. You are trying to fall back on technicalities here, and its your modus operandi whenever arguments don't go they way you want.
You're saying that more laws equal less guns and less guns equal less death in children. This is absolutely true and I am not debating that. But the manner in which children die to firearms is an important distinction in this discussion, and one you are unwilling to concede. The data specifically shows that the portion of "unintentional" death - which is the only portion that any legislation will actually affect - is so small in the grand scheme of things that it won't even move the needle if you magically eliminated all of it tomorrow.
Like most narratives, you start with a sprinkle of truth and extrapolate to make it so "if we just added gun laws, our problems would all be solved." Even if you don't come out and say that, it is obvious that is what the CNN article that you posted (and your intent in opening the thread) were on about.
I am not the sheep you folks are used to brainwashing in schools and in your DNC mail lists. I see right through your bullshit, even if you want to innocently pretend you were just talking about a few "lil ol' laws that won't hurt nobody."
