The Stochastic Indicator

Status
Not open for further replies.
I posted in the Journal for this stuff.

About 25% of it is posted as a condensed version (Version I). I set it up as a post for Februaries stochastic thread. I had to divide it into parts so that it would stick to the wall. They only take so many characters per here. I tried for Word page breaks.

I say what version I is there too.

Version II is coming up as well. This is a very tight staccatto version you can use as a reference. I am only going to post the facts. and each new concept will be italicized and bold. the chronological referencing serves a major purpose. People always have trouble knowing if they are learning something correctly. If a spurious personal situation arrises and you make up a card for yourself. You can use the chron version II to sit in the space where your uncomfortableness lies. I know i am speaking of personal and not technical or strategic, but there is a connection that remains unconscious. It will surface as you take laps in the area.

My request is that for these things in the journal that come up for you, please address them here.

One thing you will notice is that it is easier to read. Another most important thing is how, by all the strong pro active participation we can all see how skills, knowledge and experience come into being. You provide the real exhibition of each of these things as they manifest through transference and iterative refinement.

Looks like page 200 is coming up. The process of creation here is stellar, absolutely stellar.
 
Quote from bubba7:

I posted in the Journal for this stuff.

About 25% of it is posted as a condensed version (Version I). I set it up as a post for Februaries stochastic thread. I had to divide it into parts so that it would stick to the wall. They only take so many characters per here. I tried for Word page breaks.

I say what version I is there too.

Version II is coming up as well. This is a very tight staccatto version you can use as a reference. I am only going to post the facts. and each new concept will be italicized and bold. the chronological referencing serves a major purpose. People always have trouble knowing if they are learning something correctly. If a spurious personal situation arrises and you make up a card for yourself. You can use the chron version II to sit in the space where your uncomfortableness lies. I know i am speaking of personal and not technical or strategic, but there is a connection that remains unconscious. It will surface as you take laps in the area.

My request is that for these things in the journal that come up for you, please address them here.

One thing you will notice is that it is easier to read. Another most important thing is how, by all the strong pro active participation we can all see how skills, knowledge and experience come into being. You provide the real exhibition of each of these things as they manifest through transference and iterative refinement.

Looks like page 200 is coming up. The process of creation here is stellar, absolutely stellar.

a little failure here on my part. tried to move Word copy with BOLD emphasis (Front end of version II) into ET but it dies. Some guidance please.
 
Quote from bubba7:

I see all the bold stuff in the Word stuff I pasted into ET was lost.

I will work on that for a minute or two. Italic test.

Shoot me a post in the stochastics thread to let me know how to be able to do something to emphasize.

I tried attaching but word file is "too big"
Jack,

ET uses what are called vB Codes to display bold, italic, underline, etc. It doesn't read Microsoft Word internal codes for displaying such. If you have a word (or group of words) that you want to bold then you need to do it manually, by typing [ b ] before the word(s) and [ /b ] after the word(s). Note that unlike what I just typed, be sure to leave no spaces on either side of the letter "b" inside the brackets. I had to leave spaces for this explanation or everything would have gotten bolded between them and the vB codes would have been hidden. For italicizing you would use [ i ] and [ /i ] again being sure to leave no spaces on either side of the letter "i" inside the brackets. For underline use [ u ] and [ /u ] with the same caveat about spacing. In all cases make sure you put a "/" (forward slash) before the second use of the letter like I did above (that is, in the closing set of brackets). Before submitting the post click Preview to make sure it's displaying the way you want it. If not, fix the codes and click Preview again until it looks just right.
 
Quote from baggerlord:

Actually I just spent the last 4 hours reading the whole thread and I take back what I said. There is some good stuff here and I am certainly going to incorporate parts of it into my trading style. I would like to apologize to Jack for calling him a "madman". :) Thanks for all the time you've put into this thread.

Welcome aboard, Baggerlord.

If you are skeptical of the methods as yet, ask Vorzo what simulator he uses, and paper trade. Any terminology that gets confusing, someone will help catch up.

Open mindedness on your part means you have the battle half won.:cool:
 
Quote from CrescitEundo:




Very true and Very Kewl.
Jack has changed the way i think/ approach a lot of things. I played a couple games of chess today and was amazed by how much farther ahead in the game I could see as a result of my 'new' way of thinking.

NO WAY, I play chess too, and was thinking about sequences the entire way. Helped my game as well.:D
 
Well I'm a chess master, and I can't say this has improved my game, but it has certainly improved my trading! You guys are right about the general concepts being taught here. I am not too big on a lot of the indicators, I mainly like the way transitions in the market are being explained. BTW, Jack, is English your first language?
 
Quote from baggerlord:

Well I'm a chess master, and I can't say this has improved my game, but it has certainly improved my trading! You guys are right about the general concepts being taught here.

I wasn't very good to start with:)
 
the entwined short rocket using points 1,2,3 is a statement for this group. As you gain in consciousness and "see" more, here you notice that all the pieces form a whole.

You now know by now that you can't see divergence ahead of time. Another point: as you move to 15min you get to relax. You do relax when you reach the point that you know you know what is going on. Self trust is being kindled here. Ultimately, you take your temperature with you bank account.

I am plugging away with the coding on words.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top