The State of Kentucky reacts to Paul's racists comments...

Quote from peilthetraveler:

Palin/Paul for President 2012!!!
More...

As a liberal I pray for that ticket and will be the first in line to vote for palin in the Republican primaries
 
Palin and Paul are not philisophically homogeneous. They have very different positons on many issues.

Sara Palin is a neocon in libertarian drag. Paul is a conservative libertarian. Very, very different.

Quote from ..........:

As a liberal I pray for that ticket and will be the first in line to vote for palin in the Republican primaries
More...
 
Quote from phenomena:

Palin and Paul are not philisophically homogeneous. They have very different positons on many issues.

Sarah Palin is a neocon in libertarian drag. Paul is a conservative libertarian. Very, very different.
More...

I know they are different.I don't agree with Paul and think that he is a hypocrite racist,But I do believe that he is a smart and capable man

Sarah Palin is a fucking idiot who isn't fit to hold any office

I would love for either of them to be the Republican nominee
 
Another vodka induced post.

Yawn.



Quote from OPTIONAL777:

(AP) - The Kentucky Senate, reacting to a divisive comment by Republican Rand Paul, has adopted a resolution declaring any form of discrimination to be inconsistent with American values.

Louisville Democratic Sen. Gerald Neal introduced the resolution Friday during a special session on the state budget. It was adopted without objection in the predominantly Republican chamber.

Neal, Kentucky's only black state senator, said he took personal offense at the comment made last week by Paul, a U.S. Senate candidate, who was criticizing the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Paul said in an MSNBC interview that the federal government shouldn't have the power to force restaurants to serve minorities if business owners don't want to.

Neal said Paul's "extreme belief" has made Kentucky "a laughingstock."
More...
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Attack the messenger...what a legal strategy...illogical as hell of course, but since so many of the klannish use it, they must think it is effective...and it does work on illogical irrational Fox News loving types...

...jem, the oppressed cracker redneck living in San Diego following the ways of Carleton Sheets...

Too funny...

...any time you want to get back to the topic of the beat down and spanking of Paul by the state of Kentucky.
More...

too troll like --- optional zzz the racist liberal attacks the messenger using a "holier than thou" racist attack combined with unsubstantiated off beat dennis miller esosteric but incorrect remarks strategy".
 
This is exactly why we get bland, generic campaigns with candidates favoring such controversial issues as "reform", "change" and "fairness." And why most of the money is spent on attack ads trying to demonize opponents.

If a thoughtful or even eccentric candidate tries to say something intellectual, they are immediately attacked by the establishment as racist, homophobic, unpatriotic, dangerous, etc. Since most voters are not intellectuals ro deep thinkers, it tends to work too.

Rand Paul was naive to think that just because Rachel Maddow has a Phd, she would be willing to have an intellectually honest discussion. Of course, it's also a good idea to have thought through obvious objections to your ideas before you go on national TV to debate them with a far left activist.
 
Your boy eccentric George Allen sure got a lot of votes with his exciting Macaca Boy comments...

Rand refusing to answer the question is your idea of intellectual honesty...


Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

This is exactly why we get bland, generic campaigns with candidates favoring such controversial issues as "reform", "change" and "fairness." And why most of the money is spent on attack ads trying to demonize opponents.

If a thoughtful or even eccentric candidate tries to say something intellectual, they are immediately attacked by the establishment as racist, homophobic, unpatriotic, dangerous, etc. Since most voters are not intellectuals ro deep thinkers, it tends to work too.

Rand Paul was naive to think that just because Rachel Maddow has a Phd, she would be willing to have an intellectually honest discussion. Of course, it's also a good idea to have thought through obvious objections to your ideas before you go on national TV to debate them with a far left activist.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top