The State of Georgia is a virtual tie between Trump and Clinton

The thing we a pointing out is you are the one being disingenuous here. After seven years of deficits don't matter you are pointing them out as a problem?

It would be as if I said that the Federal Reserve creating trillions of dollars at will and diluting the value of our currency were not a problem after my choice for Chairman was about to be put in charge.



Ricter said:
So? Fear mongering over the deficit and debt is all we heard from you during early Obama. Why wouldn't I rub Drumpf's plan, estimated to make both worse, in your face? Particularly since Drumpf would be doing it via discretionary actions, unlike under Obama when it was non-discretionary, counter cyclical spending, and falling revenues, that caused it.
More...
 
jem said:
The thing we a pointing out is you are the one being disingenuous here. After seven years of deficits don't matter you are pointing them out as a problem?
More...
I never said they "don't matter". I said they don't deserve the shrieking they got from you. So I'm not pointing them out as a problem, I'm pointing out that various analyses of Drumpf's economic ideas inidcate he would make them worse, on the discretionary side (unlike what happened under Obama). So where's your shrieking now? Still seeing Drumpf in a royal purple robe?
 
we are talking about your history of posting here for years. you argued / supported more spending and inflation. you were a krugmanite. So I don't know what you think you were doing with Trump... but it sure looked like you were trying to scare people with deficit talk.



Ricter said:
I never said they "don't matter". I said they don't deserve the shrieking they got from you. So I'm not pointing them out as a problem, I'm pointing out that various analyses of Drumpf's economic ideas inidcate he would make them worse, on the discretionary side (unlike what happened under Obama). So where's your shrieking now? Still seeing Drumpf in a royal purple robe?
More...
 
Trying to turn the world back 200 years is a loser's strategy. Please do.


Scataphagos said:
You angling to make the false argument... "Americans are all decedent from immigrants, ergo all immigrants should be welcomed, taken in, and supported"?

When and why my ancestors came is irrelevant. There was no "social tit" to suck on 200 years ago.

We had an immigration policy until recent years which limited the number of immigrants and vetted them. Now they are just a hoard of invaders who (1) should not be able to get into this country in unfettered numbers, and (2) if they had to "make their own way" because there was no social system to exploit, they wouldn't be here at all.

(I searched your prior posts. They have a Lefty stench to 'em. And as I hate what the Lefties have done and are doing to America, I suspect you're about 1 post away from my ON IGNORE list.)
More...
 
jem said:
but it sure looked like you were trying to scare people with deficit talk.
More...
As I said, you were trying to scare people with deficit talk. I'm pointing out that the possibility of big deficits is ahead again, but it would be Drumpf doing it (not a recession). So what's your tune now, we'll be ok if it happens?
 
Ricter said:
As I said, you were trying to scare people with deficit talk. I'm pointing out that the possibility of big deficits is ahead again, but it would be Drumpf doing it (not a recession). So what's your tune now, we'll be ok if it happens?
More...
No, it's definitely not okay.

But Trump is addressing the cause of the structural deficit (offshoring). We get jobs back and we're running surpluses again. This takes time and it's not an exact science.
 
specifically99 said:
Trying to turn the world back 200 years is a loser's strategy. Please do.
More...

What was going to be your next retort, "I'm rubber, you're glue"?

I'm convinced. You have nothing of value to add to any discussion. ON IGNORE!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top