The staggered butterflies

Guys, he has posted over 1000 trades on this site. He has answered so many questions, why are we still posting 132 directional flies? @ironchef why do you keep downgrading yourself? I always here you say "us retail" or "I am so stupid". Take the time to learn the basics. I had 0 clue what @destriero or @Kevin Schmit were talking about when I first got on this site . + your not stupid but if you continue to say stuff like that.........
I appreciate your encouragement. We don't all progress at the same speed. And there are a lot I don't know or don't understand.

Don't get me wrong, I am good at trading directional but anything else is a struggle.
 
Have you read his atticus and riskarb journals? I found those to be less cryptic and enjoyable reads. I think in his older age he's becoming more Shakespearean. Someone should start a thread where we break down his sentences.
Thanks. I will search atticus and riskarb in addition to des. They are all one and the same?
 
Have you read his atticus and riskarb journals? I found those to be less cryptic and enjoyable reads. I think in his older age he's becoming more Shakespearean. Someone should start a thread where we break down his sentences.

Yes, found all his aliases. Despite spending a lot of time on his journals, I think I only gained more insight lately when the subject was revisited few times in the last two years or so. I think I now have a decent understanding of one of the setups and will start a new thread on it tomorrow. Good night for now!
 
Don't be surprised if google will steer you into this forum.

Anyway I'll volunteer to take on the embarrassment.

If you have a bullish bias for example, do you use the upper setup and set it so the -3 peak is where you expect the UL to be? Or you set it so the peak sits a bit lower than that level?
I understand that there is more to take into account than just that, but for mere mortals who don't speak Greek, is this a good starting point? View attachment 197948

No. That is not the way 231 or 132 are traded by @destriero. What you are showing is directional and it is not bimodal as traded by @destriero
 
Back
Top