I'd have to again push you to think through your and
@trader99's logic. The vast majority of real estate in CA, including in the Bay Area where I lived for a decade, is not billionaire real estate. Probably something like 95% of it is sub-2,500 square foot in older (and to my eye not terribly attractive) buildings. And that real estate is continuing to climb in price. Meanwhile, third world state real estate is not climbing in price at the same rate. Therefore, an assertion that "business owners, or higher wage earners", later modified to "new relative poor", "Millionaires but under 10 mill." were fleeing isn't supported by the relative real estate prices in the regions mentioned. So if one had any intellectual curiosity they'd be wondering why that was? Is CA just creating wealth at such a high rate that it outstrips any "fleeing" going on? If so, that's a pretty impressive feat of capitalism. Or, as I asked earlier, do supply and demand just not work in CA like the rest of the world? There's no demand for real estate but the prices stay high across the board? And the opposite is the case in NC? Seems unlikely doesn't it? Or perhaps Occam's Razor would be that the whole "fleeing" meme is a bit overblown? Your thoughts?