The Shuttle and American Space Program - A New Strategy

[GIDEONSPY]

Chinese space shuttle

 

[GIDEONSPY]

Nasa next space shuttle----x-37

 

[Burtakus]

You people really do not know what you are talking about.

Yes the Shutel airframe is 30 years old but the internals are mostly newer technology. The Shutlte go through a major upgrade cycle about every three years.

The Chineese ship is nothing more than a soviet Soyuz that has been slightly enlarger by a few inches. It still uses old school technology.

In the space busniess, technology is not all that counts. The latest and greatest does not always provide the best solution to the problem. Hence the reason the Soviet Soyuz is still flying while the Shuttle is being grounded.

 

[acronym]

Ironically, its probably the old technology that will effect the future most-a bit of space junk could take out anything thats been designed or envisaged so far.

 

[nononsense]

Quote from GIDEONSPY:

I total agree with you on--------the shuttle is old technology, but currently no one has the capability to send 7 crew astronauts into space and dock in a space station. Chinese are a concern in the future (especially in spending cost 2.3 billion in six months for the nasa shuttle)------please read this article “will space be Chinese”----- I hope not, but I agree “America needs to get on the ball”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Space could be Chinese by the year 2050, experts say
...

I have posted enough about NASA a long time ago.

As to your: "I hope not, but I agree America needs to get on the ball”, don't forget that when NASA started about 1970, the US didn't have a $41billion ticket for bringing its illegal immigration in compliance with its laws.

If this trend continues, by 2050 Americans may definitely "get on the ball again" by hiring themselves out as cheap unlawful labor for the Chinese.

So "getting on the ball" ain't that straightforward these days!

 

[nononsense]

Quote from Burtakus:

You people really do not know what you are talking about.

Yes the Shutel airframe is 30 years old but the internals are mostly newer technology. ...

Hey Burtakus,

You must be a wise guy. Don't you really know that the last couple of times the main problem with the " Shutel"(sic) was in fact on the outside, not the inside!

 

[invaliduser]

Spend the money on the power grid.

 

[Burtakus]

Quote from nononsense:

Hey Burtakus,

You must be a wise guy. Don't you really know that the last couple of times the main problem with the " Shutel"(sic) was in fact on the outside, not the inside!

Yes, I am accutely aware that the problems have been on the outside, primarily from ET shedding striking the orbiter and damaging the thermal protection system. This is a design flaw more than anything else. Had the Shuttle been deisgned with the orbiter on top of the ET instead of mounted to the side and lower down then the ET foam shedding would not be a problem.

 

[Sparohok]

Quote from Burtakus:

Had the Shuttle been deisgned with the orbiter on top of the ET instead of mounted to the side and lower down then the ET foam shedding would not be a problem.

Yeah, but it might have raised some minor technical problems like how the shuttle main motors are going to work when they're pointing straight at their own fuel source.

If you put the motors on the external tank it's not a space shuttle anymore, it's basically Saturn V.

Martin

 

[PoundTheRock]

I always enjoyed the tour at the Cape, where they show visitors all of this great technology that NASA has developed over the years. Especially striking was the image of a frying pan... wow NASA invented Teflon! I think that was it though.