Quote from paperboy:
Although i am no expert i think i can recommend reading about Huna - the esoteric knowledge of Hawaiian shamanism. They have a Yahoo group.
"The only way you can have your life exactly the way you want it, is to be connected to Spirit." There are many esoteric paths, there are many teachers, and many ways to the light. Ultimately they all lead to the same place within you, to the great light, which is the source of consciousness. Know this -- all the ancient teachings are One. In seeking the ancient way look for the similarities NOT the differences."
There are similarities here with Huna. The question in my mind is whether Master Key and Huna are independently observing/describing phenomenon or just retelling observation of third party. I do not dispute quality of observation, but method of arrival.
To be clearer.
Case 1:
A sees reality X;
B sees reality X;
A & B come to same conclusion which is understood by C as more trustworthy since they were independently observed.
Case 2:
A sees reality X and/or reads info Y about reality X;
B sees reality X and/or reads info Y about reality X;
A & B come to same conclusion, but it is less trustworthy to C since observations of A and B are not independent of each other (info Y is similar).
So with Master Key and Huna, we *may* have a Case2 since both systems where created at approximately the same time. For example Huna founder (Huna is a reconstructed system... Max F. Long) might have very well read Master Key.

