The secret that all the Guru's are desperate to keep hiden.

Quote from austinp:

<i>"then the customers should be beating the S&P over say 5 years+. I have yet to see a single guru who has supplied proof of this...</i>

P.S... not a good example, buy & hold S&P or any stock market index over the past five years. An earthworm farm would have outperformed that.

Yeah I should have clarified - if their approach was investing in or trading stocks from the long side, then beating the S&P would be a decent benchmark. Obviously if they are doing longs & shorts, or trading futures or forex, then it's different. In that case, a reasonable absolute return would be sufficient.
 
Quote from austinp:

where are the blotters in P&L thread showing proof


You consider that as proof ?

I have lost this year about $3000 net but I can post blotters of +$1000 days.

Cherry picking trading days is the secret.

Vendor standards of proof ?

You still stand by your claim that the spread is a no-cost factor ?

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=146473&highlight=spread


On topic now, I have kept a journal since my very first trade and what I can say is that I have become a less consistent loser , keep working hard.
 
Quote from Cutten:

Non sequitur - concluding that gurus who won't provide account statements are a waste of money does not imply that trying to learn by yourself solely by using internet message boards is a good idea.

It's important here to clarify the distinction between a guru/vendor and a mentor.

A mentor:

1) Is motivated primarily by the desire to teach other people to become profitable traders
2) Aligns his self-interest with that of the student (e.g. profit-split, or giving advice in return for grunt-work/research)
3) Is honest and fully discloses the reality of the situation - how likely the person is to succeed, the pitfalls, risks, and rewards.
4) Focuses mostly on teaching useful skills
5) Has a small number of proteges who he gives a lot of individual attention to

A guru/vendor:

1) Is motivated primarily by the desire to extract as much cash as possible from their customers
2) Does not align his self-interest with that of the customers, and in many cases has an arrangement where their interests are directly *opposed* (e.g. charging flat fees, subscriptions)
3) Does not fully disclose the reality of the situation.
4) Focuses mostly on sales and marketing (seminars, DVDs/CD-ROMs, gimmicks etc)
5) Has a large number of customers who he gives little individual attention to

In my opinion, a mentor is far superior to a guru/vendor.

There are also various other ways to learn, that are faster, cheaper, and better than solo off the internet:

1) Join a good trading firm, hedge fund, or financial institution that trades. Learn while getting paid, from proven profitable practitioners.
2) Work on an exchange floor as a clerk. Learn from the guy you clerk for, and other traders.
3) If you can't get either of those two, then find a profitable trader, and get mentored in return for doing grunt work, a profit split, or other situations where your interests and that of the mentor are aligned (i.e. they only make money if you do).
4) Join a reputable prop shop which offers a payout split and/or salary and does not churn or gouge you.
5) Do a lot of reading - stuff by and about proven profitable traders, not message board junk. Then experiment with small size, keep a trading diary, collaborate with other people online or in person, and teach yourself. This is slower and more expensive than the other options.

You could also choose to use a guru/vendor. In my opinion, and in the experience of many people who have been disappointed by them, in most cases all this will do is waste your time and money. Focus on finding a mentor, not a vendor.

This is excellent advice. I think that one of the best paths, in the past, to becoming a trader was to have gotten work on the floor of an exchange as a clerk/runner etc. Sadly those opportunities are becoming few and far between.
 
Back
Top