Quote from nitro:
I don't get what is so honorable and what "rush" anyone gets from the use of extreme advantage to kill someone. I realize this is not wrestling and boxing where two evenly matched opponents square off, or two samruai standing at arms length to square off in battle, but if I went and beat up on a kid and got a rush from it, don't you think I would be a little sick?
It may be necessary, but to take pride in this kind of thing is ill-conceived. It should instead be seen as sad situation with no positive outcome. All I see in that video is a bully.
Nitro, you're still confused with sportsmanship, and war. There's no such thing called, "fairness" in war, hence war is sad. Watch the video again without bias, and you'll see that the Apache pilots, and gunners involved were not taunting, denigrating, or yelling, "Jesus is great" every time they pulled the trigger.
They were professionals, doing their job, as they were supposed to do. Further more, see how they avoided the donkeys, and pitched tents to avoid collateral damage (ie: women and children in tents?). You would not see this kind of professionalism from many armies around the world.
Also, if you think boxing is fair; you obviously have never been in a fight in the ring. If my opponent hits me in my right eye, and I couldn't see very well anymore, do you think he would stop hitting me in the right eye, or punch me on my left side only? Fat chance of that happening, my friend. He would exploit every disadvantage I have, until I was beaten to a pulp, or knocked out.
Similarly, two samurais squaring off each other only exists in the movies. In real world, they would've assassinated each other using their henchmen, so they wouldn't have to square away one on one.
All that aside, great trending day today, and I'm done for the day
Schaefer