Howard Gardner wrote a book in which he listed seven kinds of intelligence in humans:
1.) Verbal-linguistic - writers, journalists
2.) Logical-mathematical - mathematicians, engineers
3.) Visual-spatial - architects, artists
4.) Musical
5.) Intrapersonal - philosophers, psychologists, theologians
6.) Interpersonal - politicians, sales
7.) Bodily-kinesthetic - athletes, dancers, soldiers, surgeons
SAT & ACT tests only measure the first three. If you get a high score you are considered "smart". But, in reality you are only certified smart in those three areas.
Some people dismiss the bottom four as skills or talents. But that is inaccurate as they require complex interaction within the brain or between the brain and body. A seven foot hulk who does not have bodily-kinesthetic intelligence will be useless on the basketball court against a 5'9" player with superior bodily-brain interaction.
In my opinion, discretionary trading requires superior intelligence in the intrapersonal, visual-spatial and bodily-kinesthetic areas (in decreasing importance).
It is frustrating for someone who is "smart" by traditional measures not to be able to get trading. But, the way one should look at it is - just because you have a high SAT score, does that mean you will become a great musician if you dedicate yourself to the task? Possibly, but not always. You have to have musical intelligence.
All this being said, you could have the skills but they haven't come to the surface yet, so you should not give up. On the other hand, if it does not feel right, you may just not have the needed ingredient and there is no shame in walking away, just as you would if you decided that you were not cut out to be a musician.
Quote from Index piker:
Unfortunately the facts just don't really conform to your assertion that successful trading or investing for that matter are like other professions in which one learns a specific skill set.
1) The ability to prove skill and to impart that skill to others is virtually non-existent compared to other TRUE professions like medical or dental school.
2) Study, hard work, effort precisely do not lend themselves to outperformance because there is virtually no skill to learn in the first place.
3)success is more or less dependent upon luck (idiosyncratic risk ) and the amount of market risk assumed.