The S&P will end 2005 @

The S&P will close the year at what price?

  • under 1200

    Votes: 20 10.5%

  • alittle lower 1201-1249

    Votes: 21 11.0%

  • around here 1250-1279

    Votes: 52 27.2%

  • higher 1280-1320

    Votes: 60 31.4%

  • over 1320 baby!

    Votes: 38 19.9%
  • Total voters
    191
Quote from rubberbird:

I can now say with virtual certainty, with the S&P currently @ 1258, and looking at above poll, the S&P will end the year between 1201-1249 choice #2
More...

assertion made on 12/27

I voted FIRST in this poll, and I won it. I guess it was just dumb luck. The same type of dumb luck that gave you CME, TZOO, GOOG as "sells" right before they each plummetted 10%-20%. Tell me how easy it is to find corrections in the GOOG and CME stocks, but I did, and posted info on ET BEFORE hand. The same type of dumb luck that called S&P tops with pinpoint accuracy. And yes, I did make mistakes too. Doesn't everyone?

It's funny how there are so many newbies looking for the holy grail, especially on this site. I disguised myself well enough that it was hard to tell what type of trader I am.

Here's what type:

1) I've made double digit returns EVERY year for the last 10 years. My average return over 10 years is +40% per year (on a minimum 7 figure account).

2) The 100M+ hedge fund I co-manage is up over +10% this year. Can any other funds say that in 2005?

Those on this site who were able to think for themselves and recognize my unique abilities hopefully made out well from my posts.
 
This would almost be funny if it wasn't for your self posting to yourself with so many different alias's. The last couple of days it has been so obvious the many names that you use.

This is not a good thing for anyone joining this site and that is why it is pathetic what your doing. But have fun but your not fooling many here!
 
Quote from Star:

This would almost be funny if it wasn't for your self posting to yourself with so many different alias's. The last couple of days it has been so obvious the many names that you use.

This is not a good thing for anyone joining this site and that is why it is pathetic what your doing. But have fun but your not fooling many here!
More...

Agreed.

This thread and forum is totally pathetic.
One egomaniac and so many aliases.
This guy really has some deep-seated mental issues.
 
Quote from AltarEgo15:

Agreed.

This thread and forum is totally pathetic.
One egomaniac and so many aliases.
This guy really has some deep-seated mental issues.
More...
Quote from Star:

This would almost be funny if it wasn't for your self posting to yourself with so many different alias's. The last couple of days it has been so obvious the many names that you use.

This is not a good thing for anyone joining this site and that is why it is pathetic what your doing. But have fun but your not fooling many here!
More...
Really? I obviously fooled both of you psycho losers, which is probably not too difficult.
The jealous mind works in mysterious ways!

I have no aliases. Zero, None. I don't think either of you can say the same.

I'm just Rubberbird, the best trader this site will ever know.
 
Yes, I won the contest of guessing the year end S&P close.

Yes, I sold 1275 calls and made out like a bandit.

Yes, I used ET as a perfect contrarian indicator. This poll was made solely to see what the majority of ET monkeys thought. And then I guaranteed the S&P would end where the least people guessed (1201-1249). I was right, and made a killing selling premium to the idiots who expected the proverbial "X-mas rally".
 
Quote from rubberbird:

Yes, I won the contest of guessing the year end S&P close.

Yes, I sold 1275 calls and made out like a bandit.
More...

Then post your brokers statement showing the date you sold 1275 calls as well as the bandit profits you say they made for you...with you name and account number blacked out!
 
Give the man his due. He's stuck his neck out and made big calls maybe 5-6 times this year (that I can recall) and had big wins on maybe 3-4. Thats pretty damn good, IMO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top