You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The S&P looks very toppy
- Thread starter James Stock
- Start date
Quote from riskarb:
What truth? What is the BET? That you have an account? That you have an audited performance based upon what $$ amount?
And no, numbnuts, you started this -- so let's finalize the $50,000USD bet and we're a go... bore us with specifics.
arb.
The bet can be 1) that I have this audited performance or 2) that it blows yours away or 3) that I made money 9 consecutive years or 4) that I have an average return of 40-50% or 5) that everything I said is true.
Take your pick.
Quote from James Stock:
The bet can be 1) that I have this audited performance or 2) that it blows yours away or 3) that I made money 9 consecutive years or 4) that I have an average return of 40-50% or 5) that everything I said is true.
Take your pick.
Naw, dude, you conveniently forgot your statement that this was all done on a "Seven figure account"...
The dispute included account size. My returns aren't audited, but they don't need to be, my account liq value speaks for itself.
You prove your identity, provide info that can be validated by a responsible 3rd party that you've got an account in seven-figures and that you've indeed made in excess of 40% per year ON a seven figure base.
I will provide my account to this responsible third party and prove that my account has a greater net liq.
If you can do that, then you've got me beat, if not, then in the immortal words of Specul8r, [this post has been edited for all audiences by the mod.]
arb.
Quote from riskarb:
Naw, dude, you conveniently forgot your statement that this was all done on a "Seven figure account"...
The dispute included account size. My returns aren't audited, but they don't need to be, my account liq value speaks for itself.
You prove your identity, provide info that can be validated by a responsible 3rd party that you've got an account in seven-figures and that you've indeed made in excess of 40% per year ON a seven figure base.
I will provide my account to this responsible third party and prove that my account has a greater net liq.
If you can do that, then you've got me beat, if not, then in the immortal words of Specul8r, ****
arb.
FIRST we define and make a bet. We are betting that I have a better track record than you. It means nothing to me what money is in the account you show to this "3rd" party. Heck, you could be showing someones mutual fund for all I know.
Level the playing field, ass clown. I have an audit, I have 9 consecutive years of profitability on a 7+ figure account.
Now which of these specific facts are you competing against???
Guys, please try to keep the language and attacks to a minimum so this thread won't have to be moved to chit-chat. Thanks.