The S&P has topped !!

[rubberbird]

the bird loves long odds, and I think I got a good one today. I betting that both underdogs, the steelers AND the panthers win. I'm getting 5.5 to 1 odds (11 to 2), but they BOTH must win.

of course, if the referees do to the steelers what they did last week, i am probably going to lose. funny how someone threw a brick through that idiot referee's window this week (the ref who over-ruled the obvious interception).

 

[CowboyBlue]

i was going to say it was her sisters husband but i guess im wrong....


glad to know im not a psycho


GO STEELERS

i thought the steelers had odds in this game...

 

[easyguru]

Quote from rubberbird:

Correct. Darn, I was hoping to get this answer from a few of the real psycho's on this board. This was not a "brain teaser", it is a "psycho" test.

If you answered this correctly, you think like a psychopath.
This was a test by a famous American Psychologist used to test if
one has the same mentality as a killer. Many arrested serial killers took part in the test and answered the question correctly. If you didn't answer the question correctly, good for you.

I assume you've heard this question, and thus knew the correct answer!

I just used logic!!!

 

[rubberbird]

Quote from rubberbird:

the bird loves long odds, and I think I got a good one today. I betting that both underdogs, the steelers AND the panthers win. I'm getting 5.5 to 1 odds (11 to 2), but they BOTH must win.

damn it, what happened to the "edit" function ??

I like the steelers in the super bowl, obviously.

 

[rubberbird]

Quote from rubberbird:

And he's back just in time to see this crystal clear top formation. The S&P will not see 1300 this month, so it has topped.

i'm now saying this for the entire 6 month period.
The S&P will not see 1300 in the 1st half of 2006.
Anyway, i don''t like the "edit" change. i'm outa here. Good night.

 

[rubberbird]

Quote from rubberbird:

The S&P will not see 1300 in the 1st half of 2006.

Is there anyone on "elite-trader" who disagrees with my assertion that the S&P will not see 1300 in the 1st half of 2006?

Please stand up, be a man and show some grapefruits, and say if you disagree.

This is my final post.

 

[esmjb]

i believe it will

 

[lilduckling]

Quote from rubberbird:

Is there anyone on "elite-trader" who disagrees with my assertion that the S&P will not see 1300 in the 1st half of 2006?

Please stand up, be a man and show some grapefruits, and say if you disagree.

This is my final post.

well...... at first i disagreed...... but now i agree with you.
thanks to the japanese mkt, it ruined my chance for fame!

Oh well..... like i said.... you most likely would call it right again.

 

[BDGBDG]

Only after a 5% correction. The market is going to crash in the next couple of days.

 

[doublea]

Quote from rubberbird:

Is there anyone on "elite-trader" who disagrees with my assertion that the S&P will not see 1300 in the 1st half of 2006?

Please stand up, be a man and show some grapefruits, and say if you disagree.

This is my final post.

Bird: I'll have to disagree with you on this one. I think we'll see 1300 in the 1st half of 2006. My long-term analysis shows that 2006 will end up being another classic bubble.

Anyway, I exited out of my shorts when the market was unable to follow through to the down side. Looking for another opportunity to go short. Might get that in a day or two!!!