The S&P has topped !

Has the S&P topped and headed for a sharp correction?

  • yes

    Votes: 58 30.5%

  • no

    Votes: 59 31.1%

  • I don't know / I don't care / I don't like you

    Votes: 73 38.4%
  • Total voters
    190
Quote from Tsing Tao:

you're so funny when you're mad.
More...
"mad", sure lol!

i'm laughing at you. hey try starting your own thread and see how well it does. why be a follower and piggyback off of someone else?
 
Quote from fly down:

"mad", sure lol!

i'm laughing at you. hey try starting your own thread and see how well it does. why be a follower and piggyback off of someone else?
More...

i do start my own threads when i have something relevant to post. i dont just post silly top calls for the hell of it.

and you are mad. its obvious every time you come out swinging with the same retorts - nothing original. :(

dont be a hater! i know the market is tough but just dont fight the fed (for now)
 
Quote from bkveen3:

Currently the FED is only buying assets that would be bought anyways if banks weren't being extremely risk averse. You say printing, but would it be any different if they FED printed it and loaned it out to some banks and then they purchased the assets? When the financial system is repaired and starts funding business again the FED can match its asset sales dollar for dollar with funds coming in. This keeps money supply fixed and the only thing that can increase is velocity. This would make it demand based inflation and would be considered a good thing. That's just how I'm seeing it. Economics is a guessing game sometimes.
More...

No they wouldn't qe2s whole point is to keep market expectations low to spur investment they are not doing it just because they want to do it. And yes it would be completely different because if they loaned banks to buy assets that would have only added the asset value to the balance sheet, this was an equity problem and the fed was correct in increasing the banks equity. But for some reason you are under the impression that as soon as fed sees inflation at 2%they will say ok trillions of dollars out of system now! It will take time and in that time inflation will continue to rise.if theh tried to sell all their t bonds that fast interest rates would go through the roof
 
Quote from bone:

To call a top, technical price action verification is required. And that means taking out the trendline channel we have been in. And that has not happened yet. When that happens, I will get short. But there is no legitimate technical price action evidence that a top has been put in.
More...

the question isnt when you will go short...it is how many times did you get stopped buying the dip yesterday and perhaps today?...:D
 
Quote from fly down:

Thanks for proving my point, once again.

I have repeatedly told you that you don't trade stocks. How do I know this? You have said it in your prior history.

So please post a link to a "trading" thread you started.

My guess is that you haven't started any trading threads b/c you don't trade stocks.
More...

oh, so i post a thread like you ask and it's not to your suiting so you change the criteria. i do not trade stocks, nor have i ever said i did. i trade etfs (spy, sds, sso, tlt, tbf, uso...etc...), but it is extremely rare that i trade individual stocks.

i am finding it hard to understand why this matters to your 36 failed top calls?

i know youre upset but try to stay focused!

baby_crying.jpg
 
"the question isnt when you will go short...it is how many times did you get stopped buying the dip yesterday and perhaps today?... "

The answer is zero times.

Flat directional price risk is for suckers - not smart money. Relative value trading is much cheaper to capitalize and leverage, and of course a much more reliable trade in terms of consistent ROI.

Pure portable alpha returns.


m9r1js.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top